How to improve the rehabilitation outcome after total knee replacement?

Background Even if total knee replacement has revolutionized the treatment of degenerative knee diseases, the definition of an ideal rehabilitation protocol is still in progress. The aim of this study is to identify the factors that influence the outcomes after early, intensive, hospitalized treatme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of public health 2022-10, Vol.32 (Supplement_3)
Hauptverfasser: Dionisi, L, De Gironimo, G, Praino, F, Abinova, G, Averame, C, Gentile, AM, Nante, N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Even if total knee replacement has revolutionized the treatment of degenerative knee diseases, the definition of an ideal rehabilitation protocol is still in progress. The aim of this study is to identify the factors that influence the outcomes after early, intensive, hospitalized treatment. Methods A retrospective study was conducted in 2019 on 545 patients admitted to a northern Italy private clinic specialized in post-surgery rehabilitation, which applies a bio-psycho-social-environmental model and individual rehabilitation plans. Data regarding each patient were collected from medical records: age, numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) at admission, days between surgery and the beginning of rehabilitation (DBS). The outcomes were measured as the difference (Δ) between the values at discharge and admission of the Barthel scale (ΔBS), Tinetti scale (ΔTS), passive flexion (ΔPF) and active flexion (ΔAF). We performed a univariate linear regression through STATA, to determine which factors influence the outcomes. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Our sample (69.17% female) was 69.8 ± 9.4 years old. ΔBS was significantly influenced by age (Coef. 0.270, CI [0.173 - 0.367]) and NPRS (Coef. 1.434, CI [0.979 - 1.890]). ΔTS was significantly influenced by age (Coef. 0.024, CI [0.011 - 0.037]) and NPRS (Coef. 0.130, CI [0.067 - 0.191]). ΔPF was significantly influenced by age (Coef. - 0.158, CI [- 0.266 - - 0.050]), DBS (Coef. - 1.047, CI [- 1.401 - - 0.687]) and NPRS (Coef. 1.825, CI [1.333 - 2.318]). ΔAF was significantly influenced by age (Coef. - 0.171, CI [- 0.300 - - 0.042]), DBS (Coef. - 1.150, CI [- 1.580 - - 0.721]) and NPRS (Coef. 2.504, CI [1.928 - 3.080]). Conclusions Older patients obtain a higher functional outcome (ΔBS, ΔTS) but lower improvement in range of motion (ΔPF, ΔAF). Patients with higher NPRS at admission obtain an overall better outcome. Higher DBS is associated to lower articular outcomes (ΔPF, ΔAF). Key messages • A better outcome can be achieved if rehabilitation is started immediately after knee replacement. • Pain and age are not factors that impede effective rehabilitation.
ISSN:1101-1262
1464-360X
DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.299