Evaluation of vessel density in healthy subjects with family history of glaucoma

Objectives To investigate whether any microvascular changes are present in optic disc, peripapillary or maculary regions in healthy subjects with a family history of glaucoma. Methods A total of 82 healthy subjects including 42 first-degree relatives of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and 40 cont...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Eye (London) 2023-01, Vol.37 (1), p.82-87
Hauptverfasser: Özyol, Pelin, Özyol, Erhan, Günel-Karadeniz, Pınar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To investigate whether any microvascular changes are present in optic disc, peripapillary or maculary regions in healthy subjects with a family history of glaucoma. Methods A total of 82 healthy subjects including 42 first-degree relatives of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and 40 controls were enroled in this cross-sectional study. Global and sectoral vessel density (VD) measurements excluding large vessels, retina nerve fibre layer (RNFL) and macula ganglion cell (mGCC) thicknesses were obtained from a combined optical coherence tomography-angiography (OCT-A) and spectral-domain OCT system. Effect size (ES) was used for evaluating the magnitude of the statistically significant difference. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were used to examine the ability of parameters to differentiate first-degree relatives to controls. Results There was no significant difference in RNFL and mGCC thicknesses between groups. Although lower VD measurements in optic disc, peripapillary region, and macula were observed in the first-degree relatives, statistically significant mean difference (3.13 ± 0.87, p  = 0.001) and large ES (0.80) were in only lower nasal sector of peripapillary region. Inter-eye asymmetry of supero-nasal VD was also statistically higher (3.74 ± 2.55 vs 1.89 ± 1.64) with a large ES in the first-degree relatives ( p  
ISSN:0950-222X
1476-5454
DOI:10.1038/s41433-021-01894-3