Medicare Part D Coverage Restrictions and Patient Cost-Sharing for Opioids Commonly Used for Cancer Pain, 2015-2021

Nation-wide rapid declines in prescription opioid dispensing gave rise to concerns regarding restricted access to effective pain management for patients with cancer-related pain. One important mechanism for such restrictions could be through more restrictive insurance coverage for opioids. This stud...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JCO oncology practice 2022-10, Vol.18 (10), p.e1574-e1586
Hauptverfasser: Bao, Yuhua, Zhang, Hao, Hartung, Daniel M, Witkin, Lisa R, Paice, Judith A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Nation-wide rapid declines in prescription opioid dispensing gave rise to concerns regarding restricted access to effective pain management for patients with cancer-related pain. One important mechanism for such restrictions could be through more restrictive insurance coverage for opioids. This study aims to assess recent changes in Medicare Part D formulary designs for opioids commonly used for cancer-related pain. We used data from the 2015-2021 Medicare Prescription Drug Plan (PDP) Formulary Files to assess formulary changes for six opioid-dose combinations commonly used for cancer-related pain. We estimated % of PDPs adopting prior authorization, quantity limits (and limits adopted), and a higher cost-sharing tier for each opioid-dose combination. We further estimated median and mean out-of-pocket (OOP) costs across all PDPs for a 30-day supply of the drug. Trends in proportions were tested using the Cochrane-Armitage test; trends in continuous measures were tested using the Jonckheere-Terpstra test. Proportion of PDPs adopting prior authorization increased from close to 0% to about 50% for two long-acting opioids ( < .001). Distribution of quantity limits across PDPs shifted over time to being more restrictive for all opioids considered ( < .001). For four of the six opioids, the proportion of PDPs adopting tier 3 or above increased from below or about 50% to well over 70% ( < .001). For the same four opioids, median OOP costs doubled to quadrupled ( < .001). Medicare PDP coverage has become increasingly restrictive for opioids commonly used for cancer-related pain, with multifold increases in patient OOP costs over the past 7 years. These changes pose concerns for patients with cancer needing opioid therapies for pain control and call for strategies to effectively exempt cancer-related pain from insurance and pharmacy rules intended to apply to opioids for noncancer chronic pain.
ISSN:2688-1527
2688-1535
DOI:10.1200/OP.21.00867