Trabeculectomy with Ologen implant versus trabeculectomy with P 50 Ex-PRESS shunt in primary open-angle glaucoma

This is the first randomized controlled trial of trabeculectomy with Ex-Press Shunt versus Ologen implant in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in Indian eyes. A prospective randomized controlled trial of patients of POAG treated with two different methods of augmented trabeculectomy. Group A with E...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical journal. Armed Forces India 2023-01, Vol.79 (1), p.26-33
Hauptverfasser: Bhatkoti, Bhupesh, Kumar, Pradeep, Verma, Gaurav, Mathur, Vijay, Waikar, Shrikant
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This is the first randomized controlled trial of trabeculectomy with Ex-Press Shunt versus Ologen implant in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in Indian eyes. A prospective randomized controlled trial of patients of POAG treated with two different methods of augmented trabeculectomy. Group A with Ex-PRESS shunt (P50 model) and Group B with Ologen implant. Surgical success was defined as intraocular pressure of 21 mm Hg or lower at 6 months postoperative. N = 40 eyes of 33 patients. Baseline IOP in Group A was 23.70 ± 4.6 mm Hg (Range 22–36 mm Hg), and Group B was 26.00 ± 4.0 mm Hg (Range 23–36 mm Hg). Surgical success was achieved in 85% of patients in both Groups. Change in IOP from baseline was statistically significant in both groups at 1, 4, 8, 12 weeks, and 6 months postoperative. No statistically significant difference in the change in IOP between the two groups. Postoperative complications were lesser in Group A compared to Group B, in both early (35% vs 50%) and late stage (20% vs 30%). The drop in visual acuity became statistically insignificant at 4 weeks in Group A and 8 weeks in Group B. There is no difference between the surgical success rates of trabeculectomy with Ex-PRESS Shunt versus Ologen. However, the Ex-PRESS shunt fares better with lower complication rates and faster visual recovery than the Ologen group.
ISSN:0377-1237
2213-4743
DOI:10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.12.013