PREVALENCE OF SENSORY IMPAIRMENTS VARY BY RACE IN OLDER US ADULTS

Few studies have examined racial/ethnic disparities in sensory function. We studied 3,005 US adults (aged 57-85, mean 69.3 years); 10% Hispanic, 17% Black, 71% White; National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project). Impairment was defined by established criteria for objectively measured vision, sme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Innovation in aging 2022-12, Vol.6 (Supplement_1), p.238-238
Hauptverfasser: Arshad, Faaizah, Pinto, Jayant, Yaffe, Kristine, Brenowitz, Willa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Few studies have examined racial/ethnic disparities in sensory function. We studied 3,005 US adults (aged 57-85, mean 69.3 years); 10% Hispanic, 17% Black, 71% White; National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project). Impairment was defined by established criteria for objectively measured vision, smell, taste, touch and interviewer-rated hearing. Vision (22%), hearing (19%), smell (23%), taste (15%), and touch (19%) loss were common. Hispanic and Blacks showed the highest prevalence of vision, smell, and touch dysfunction. Findings persisted after adjustment for age, sex, education, and cardiometabolic conditions. Blacks had higher odds of impaired vision (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR]:1.61; 95%CI:1.12, 2.32), smell (aOR:2.64; 95%CI:1.81, 3.84)) and touch (aOR:1.81; 95%CI:1.23, 2.64)) compared to Whites. Hispanics had higher odds of impaired smell than Whites (aOR:2.33; 95%CI:1.47, 3.67). Racial/ethnic minorities face marked disparities in function of the classical senses. Understanding how these differences arise, including potential systemic/social mechanisms, may catalyze interventions that promote health equity.
ISSN:2399-5300
2399-5300
DOI:10.1093/geroni/igac059.944