DETECTION OF ELDER ABUSE IN JAPAN NOT COVERED BY THE ELDER ABUSE PREVENTION LAW IN COMPARISON WITH WHO DEFINITION

The Elder Abuse Prevention Law mainly defines “elder abuse” inflicted by caregivers. Elder abuse by non-caregivers is therefore rarely covered by the law. We investigated domestic elder abuse reported in Matsudo City, Chiba, Japan, to determine the number of domestic elder abuse cases excluded from...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Innovation in aging 2022-12, Vol.6 (Supplement_1), p.344-344
Hauptverfasser: Wada, Tadashi, Suda, Hitoshi, Satoh, Kana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Elder Abuse Prevention Law mainly defines “elder abuse” inflicted by caregivers. Elder abuse by non-caregivers is therefore rarely covered by the law. We investigated domestic elder abuse reported in Matsudo City, Chiba, Japan, to determine the number of domestic elder abuse cases excluded from legal protection but constituting elder abuse defined by WHO. From April 2017 to March 2020, the municipal elder protection services agency received 525 reports of domestic elder abuse. We studied the effective records of 497 of these cases. 299 cases were confirmed elder abuse cases defined by the law, with 198 excluded. However, 176 out of the 198 excluded cases constitute elder abuse defined by WHO. In these 176 cases, abuse was perpetrated by non-caregivers. Due to the current formation of the law, this abuse went undetected and unprotected. We think amendment of the law is required to protect these excluded cases.
ISSN:2399-5300
2399-5300
DOI:10.1093/geroni/igac059.1359