Evaluation of an artificial intelligence coronary artery calcium scoring model from computed tomography
Objectives Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores derived from computed tomography (CT) scans are used for cardiovascular risk stratification. Artificial intelligence (AI) can assist in CAC quantification and potentially reduce the time required for human analysis. This study aimed to develop and eval...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European radiology 2023-01, Vol.33 (1), p.321-329 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives
Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores derived from computed tomography (CT) scans are used for cardiovascular risk stratification. Artificial intelligence (AI) can assist in CAC quantification and potentially reduce the time required for human analysis. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a fully automated model that identifies and quantifies CAC.
Methods
Fully convolutional neural networks for automated CAC scoring were developed and trained on 2439 cardiac CT scans and validated using 771 scans. The model was tested on an independent set of 1849 cardiac CT scans. Agatston CAC scores were further categorised into five risk categories (0, 1–10, 11–100, 101–400, and > 400). Automated scores were compared to the manual reference standard (level 3 expert readers).
Results
Of 1849 scans used for model testing (mean age 55.7 ± 10.5 years, 49% males), the automated model detected the presence of CAC in 867 (47%) scans compared with 815 (44%) by human readers (
p
= 0.09). CAC scores from the model correlated very strongly with the manual score (Spearman’s
r
= 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89–0.91,
p
< 0.001 and intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.98, 95% CI 0.98–0.99,
p
< 0.001). The model classified 1646 (89%) into the same risk category as human observers. The Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated little difference (1.69, 95% limits of agreement: −41.22, 44.60) and there was almost excellent agreement (Cohen’s
κ
= 0.90, 95% CI 0.88–0.91,
p
< 0.001). Model analysis time was 13.1 ± 3.2 s/scan.
Conclusions
This artificial intelligence–based fully automated CAC scoring model shows high accuracy and low analysis times. Its potential to optimise clinical workflow efficiency and patient outcomes requires evaluation.
Key Points
• Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores are traditionally assessed using cardiac computed tomography and require manual input by human operators to identify calcified lesions.
• A novel artificial intelligence (AI)–based model for fully automated CAC scoring was developed and tested on an independent dataset of computed tomography scans, showing very high levels of correlation and agreement with manual measurements as a reference standard.
• AI has the potential to assist in the identification and quantification of CAC, thereby reducing the time required for human analysis. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1432-1084 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00330-022-09028-3 |