Long-term Effectiveness and Safety of Rituximab in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder and MOG Antibody Disease

Rituximab is used widely for relapse prevention in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-IgG-associated disease (MOGAD); however, data regarding the effectiveness and safety of long-term rituximab use in these conditions are limited. In this stu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurology 2022-11, Vol.99 (22), p.e2504-e2516
Hauptverfasser: Barreras, Paula, Vasileiou, Eleni S., Filippatou, Angeliki G., Fitzgerald, Kathryn C., Levy, Michael, Pardo, Carlos A., Newsome, Scott D., Mowry, Ellen M., Calabresi, Peter A., Sotirchos, Elias S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Rituximab is used widely for relapse prevention in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-IgG-associated disease (MOGAD); however, data regarding the effectiveness and safety of long-term rituximab use in these conditions are limited. In this study, we sought to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes in patients with aquaporin-4 IgG-seropositive (AQP4-IgG+) NMOSD and MOGAD treated with rituximab. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD or MOGAD followed at the Johns Hopkins Neuromyelitis Optica Clinic and included patients who had received at least 1 dose of rituximab. We identified 111 patients with NMOSD and 23 patients with MOGAD who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The median duration of rituximab treatment for the patients with NMOSD was 3.7 years (range: 0.5-13.2 years) and for the patients with MOGAD was 2.1 years (range: 0.5-7.0 years). The annualized relapse rate (ARR) decreased after rituximab initiation in both NMOSD (median ARR: pretreatment 1.1, posttreatment 0; < 0.001) and MOGAD (median ARR: pretreatment 1.9, posttreatment 0.3; = 0.002). Relapses on rituximab occurred in 31 patients with NMOSD (28%) and 14 patients with MOGAD (61%). The majority of NMOSD treatment failures (37/48 relapses; 77%) occurred either within the initial 6 months after starting rituximab (n = 13 relapses) or in the setting of delayed/missed rituximab doses and/or peripheral B-cell reconstitution (n = 24 relapses), whereas in MOGAD, these circumstances were present in a smaller proportion of treatment failures (19/35 relapses; 54%). The risk of relapse on rituximab was greater for patients with MOGAD compared with patients with NMOSD (hazard ratio: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.5-5.2, = 0.001). Infections requiring hospitalization occurred in 13% and immunoglobulin G (IgG) hypogammaglobulinemia in 17% of patients. The median rituximab treatment duration before IgG hypogammaglobulinemia onset was 5.4 years (interquartile range: 3.8-7.7 years). Rituximab treatment is associated with the reduced annualized relapse rate in AQP4-IgG-seropositive NMOSD, especially in the absence of gaps in treatment and/or B-cell reconstitution. In MOGAD, although a reduction in relapses was observed after initiation of rituximab, this association appeared to be less robust than in AQP4-IgG-seropositive NMOSD. Severe infections and hypogammaglobulinemia occurred in a significant proportion of patients, highlighting the
ISSN:0028-3878
1526-632X
DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000201260