Clinical outcomes of single-stage versus two-stage laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass in the management of obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2): a retrospective cohort study
Background Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in patients with obesity, BMI ≥ 50 kg/m 2 , can be a challenging operation. Weight loss with intra-gastric balloon (IGB) insertion prior to LRYGB may improve operative outcomes. Methods Between June 2000 and June 2020, patients with a BMI ≥ 50...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Langenbeck's archives of surgery 2022-12, Vol.407 (8), p.3349-3356 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in patients with obesity, BMI ≥ 50 kg/m
2
, can be a challenging operation. Weight loss with intra-gastric balloon (IGB) insertion prior to LRYGB may improve operative outcomes.
Methods
Between June 2000 and June 2020, patients with a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m
2
underwent either IGB insertion followed by LRYGB (two-stage group), or LRYGB as the definitive bariatric procedure (single-stage group) in our institution. The two-stage procedure was adopted for high risk individuals. Primary outcome measures were percentage total weight loss (%TWL) at 24 months, length of stay and postoperative morbidity. Propensity score analysis was used to account for differences between groups.
Results
A total of 155 (mean age 42.9 years ± 10.60; mean BMI 54.6 kg/m
2
± 4.53) underwent either the two-stage (
n
= 30) or single-stage procedure (
n
= 125) depending on preoperative fitness. At 6 months following LRYGB, there was a significant difference in %TWL between the groups in a matched analysis (11.9% vs 23.7%,
p
< 0.001). At 24 months, there was no difference in %TWL (32.0% vs 34.7%,
p
= 0.13). Median hospital stay following LRYGB was 2.0 (1-4) days with the two-stage vs 2.0 (0-14) days for the single-stage approach (
p
= 0.75). There was also no significant difference in complication rates (
p
= 0.058) between the two groups.
Conclusions
There was no difference in weight loss after one or two-stage procedures in the treatment of patients with a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m
2
super obesity in a propensity score weighted analysis at 24 months. Length of stay and perioperative complications were similar for high risk patients; however, the two-stage approach was associated with delayed weight loss. Single-stage management is recommended for moderate risk patients, particularly with significant metabolic disorders, whilst two-stage approach is a safe and feasible pathway for high risk individuals. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1435-2451 1435-2443 1435-2451 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00423-022-02664-9 |