Pregnancy rate in intrauterine insemination, is uterine biophysical profile of predictive value? A prospective study
Purpose This study aimed at evaluating the value of uterine biophysical profile (UBP) scoring to predict the pregnancy rate after IUI. Methods This prospective study was carried out on 85 women who were referred to our tertiary teaching center with infertility of male factor or unknown etiology infe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of ultrasound 2022-03, Vol.25 (4), p.949-955 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
This study aimed at evaluating the value of uterine biophysical profile (UBP) scoring to predict the pregnancy rate after IUI.
Methods
This prospective study was carried out on 85 women who were referred to our tertiary teaching center with infertility of male factor or unknown etiology infertility in 2018. To measure the uterine biophysical criteria, transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) was performed on the day of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (B-hCG) injection, and the results were evaluated based on positive B-hCG.
Results
85 patients were included with a mean age of 30 years; of those 12 (14.1%) were able to conceive. UBP (
p
= 0.151) and it’s parameters (including endometrial thickness, number of endometrial layers, myometrial echogenicity, uterine artery pulsatility index, myometrial blood flow internal to arcuate vessels, endometrial blood flow in the third zone of endometrium, myometrial contraction frequency, and ovarian follicle (OF) size [
p
= 0.05, 0.89, 0.59, 0.79, 1, 1, 0.59, and 0.77, respectively]) were not significantly associated with pregnancy rate. 91.7% of the cases with positive pregnancy test results, had a UBP score of > 13; however, UBP score was not meaningfully associated with IUI treatment success rate (
p
= 0.15).
Conclusions
UBP scoring system seems to need more data for external validation, or it might require modifications before implementation, as it may cause false reassurance. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1876-7931 1971-3495 1876-7931 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s40477-022-00670-7 |