Head-to-Head Comparison of [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46-PET/CT and [18F]F-FDG-PET/CT for Radiotherapy Planning in Head and Neck Cancer

   Introduction In head and neck cancers (HNCs), fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is expressed by cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the tumor microenvironment. Preliminary evidence suggests that detection and staging is feasible with positron emission tomography (PET/CT) imaging using [ 68...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Molecular imaging and biology 2022-12, Vol.24 (6), p.986-994
Hauptverfasser: Wegen, Simone, van Heek, Lutz, Linde, Philipp, Claus, Karina, Akuamoa-Boateng, Dennis, Baues, Christian, Sharma, Shachi Jenny, Schomäcker, Klaus, Fischer, Thomas, Roth, Katrin Sabine, Klußmann, Jens Peter, Marnitz, Simone, Drzezga, Alexander, Kobe, Carsten
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:   Introduction In head and neck cancers (HNCs), fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is expressed by cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the tumor microenvironment. Preliminary evidence suggests that detection and staging is feasible with positron emission tomography (PET/CT) imaging using [ 68  Ga]-radiolabeled inhibitors of FAP ([ 68  Ga]Ga-FAPI-46) in HNCs. This study aims to compare [ 68  Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT and [ 18 F]-fluorodeoxy- d -glucose ([ 18 F]F-FDG) PET/CT with a focus on improved target volume definition and radiotherapy planning in patients with HNC referred for chemoradiation. Methods A total of 15 patients with HNCs received both [ 68  Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT and [ 18 F]F-FDG PET/CT with a thermoplastic mask, in addition to initial tumor staging by conventional imaging with contrast-enhanced CT and/or MRI. Mean intervals between FAPI/FDG and FAPI/conventional imaging were 4 ± 20 and 17 ± 18 days, respectively. Location and number of suspicious lesions revealed by the different procedures were recorded. Subsequently, expert-generated gross tumor volumes (GTVs) based on conventional imaging were compared to those based on [ 18 F]F-FDG and [ 68  Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT to measure the impact on subsequent radiation planning. Results All patients had focal FAPI uptake above background in tumor lesions. Compared to FDG, tumor uptake (median SUVmax 10.2 vs. 7.3, p  = 0.008) and tumor-to-background ratios were significantly higher with FAPI than with FDG (SUVmean liver: 9.3 vs. 3.2, p  
ISSN:1536-1632
1860-2002
DOI:10.1007/s11307-022-01749-7