Head-to-Head Comparison of [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46-PET/CT and [18F]F-FDG-PET/CT for Radiotherapy Planning in Head and Neck Cancer
Introduction In head and neck cancers (HNCs), fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is expressed by cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the tumor microenvironment. Preliminary evidence suggests that detection and staging is feasible with positron emission tomography (PET/CT) imaging using [ 68...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Molecular imaging and biology 2022-12, Vol.24 (6), p.986-994 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: |
Introduction
In head and neck cancers (HNCs), fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is expressed by cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the tumor microenvironment. Preliminary evidence suggests that detection and staging is feasible with positron emission tomography (PET/CT) imaging using [
68
Ga]-radiolabeled inhibitors of FAP ([
68
Ga]Ga-FAPI-46) in HNCs. This study aims to compare [
68
Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT and [
18
F]-fluorodeoxy-
d
-glucose ([
18
F]F-FDG) PET/CT with a focus on improved target volume definition and radiotherapy planning in patients with HNC referred for chemoradiation.
Methods
A total of 15 patients with HNCs received both [
68
Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT and [
18
F]F-FDG PET/CT with a thermoplastic mask, in addition to initial tumor staging by conventional imaging with contrast-enhanced CT and/or MRI. Mean intervals between FAPI/FDG and FAPI/conventional imaging were 4 ± 20 and 17 ± 18 days, respectively. Location and number of suspicious lesions revealed by the different procedures were recorded. Subsequently, expert-generated gross tumor volumes (GTVs) based on conventional imaging were compared to those based on [
18
F]F-FDG and [
68
Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT to measure the impact on subsequent radiation planning.
Results
All patients had focal FAPI uptake above background in tumor lesions. Compared to FDG, tumor uptake (median SUVmax 10.2 vs. 7.3,
p
= 0.008) and tumor-to-background ratios were significantly higher with FAPI than with FDG (SUVmean liver: 9.3 vs. 3.2,
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1536-1632 1860-2002 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11307-022-01749-7 |