Non-traumatic open globe injuries: presenting characteristics and visual outcomes
Purpose To describe clinical characteristics and visual outcomes of non-traumatic open globe injuries. Setting A level 1 trauma centre in a large urban medical centre. Design Retrospective study. Methods Charts of non-traumatic open globe patients admitted to MHH-TMC from 1/2010 to 3/2015 were revie...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Eye (London) 2022-12, Vol.36 (12), p.2323-2327 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
To describe clinical characteristics and visual outcomes of non-traumatic open globe injuries.
Setting
A level 1 trauma centre in a large urban medical centre.
Design
Retrospective study.
Methods
Charts of non-traumatic open globe patients admitted to MHH-TMC from 1/2010 to 3/2015 were reviewed for demographics, cause, clinical characteristics, visual acuity (VA) and enucleation.
Results
Thirty eyes were included: 15 (50%) were males with a mean age of 47 (±28) years. All presented with zone 1 injury. Twenty-five (83%) had a perforated corneal ulcer. Presenting VA was count fingers (
n
= 3, 10%) to NLP (
n
= 6, 20%). Twenty-four (80%) involved infection, 5 (17%) congenital, 3 (10%) chemical burn and 2 (7%) neurotrophic. Conjunctival injection (
n
= 22, 77%), corneal opacification (
n
= 20, 71%) and relative afferent pupillary defect (
n
= 9, 44%) were common. After treatment, 23 (88%) were worse than 6/60 (20/200), 9 (35%) were NLP and 8 (27%) required enucleation.
Conclusions
Often non-traumatic open globe injuries are zone 1 and due to perforated infectious ulcers. Compared to previously reported traumatic injuries, these have higher rates of enucleation (27% vs 8%) and poorer final VA (88% vs 68% worse than 6/60 20/200). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0950-222X 1476-5454 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41433-021-01869-4 |