Combined HPV 16 E2 and L1 methylation predict response to treatment with cidofovir and imiquimod in patients with vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
BACKGROUND: Topical cidofovir and imiquimod can effectively treat approximately 55% of patients with vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN), thus avoiding the need for surgery. Human papillomavirus (HPV) E 2 gene methylation predicts response to treatment but a methylation measurement is only obta...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers 2022-01, Vol.35 (2), p.143-153 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | BACKGROUND:
Topical cidofovir and imiquimod can effectively treat approximately 55% of patients with vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN), thus avoiding the need for surgery. Human papillomavirus (HPV)
E
2
gene methylation predicts response to treatment but a methylation measurement is only obtainable in approximately 50% of patients.
OBJECTIVE:
This work aimed to determine if the applicability and predictive power of the
E
2
methylation assay could be improved by combining it with the components of a host and viral DNA methylation panel (S5) that has been found to predict disease progression in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
METHODS:
HPV E2 methylation and S5 classifier score were measured in fresh tissue samples collected pre-treatment from 132 patients with biopsy-proven VIN grade 3 who participated in a multicentre clinical trial and were randomised to treatment with cidofovir or imiquimod.
RESULTS:
Combining HPV16
E
2
and HPV16
L
1
methylation provides a biomarker that is both predictive of response to topical treatment and that can produce a clinically applicable result for all patients. Patients with HPV 16
L
1
ℎ ℎ
and HPV 16
E
2
ℎ ℎ
(36/132 (27.3%)) were more likely to respond to treatment with cidofovir (12/15 (80.0%)) than imiquimod (9/21 (42.9%)) (
p
=
0.026). Patients with HPV 16
L
1
or HPV 16
E
2
(including those with no HPV/unassessable methylation) were more likely to respond to imiquimod: 23/50 (46.0%) vs 31/46 (67.4%) (
p
=
0.035).
CONCLUSIONS:
Combined HPV
E
2
and
L
1
methylation is a potential predictive marker in treatment for all patients with VIN. These findings justify validation in a prospective trial. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1574-0153 1875-8592 |
DOI: | 10.3233/CBM-210448 |