A Multicenter Randomized Trial Evaluating the Insulin-Only Configuration of the Bionic Pancreas in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes

Objective: To evaluate the insulin-only configuration of the iLet® bionic pancreas (BP) using insulin aspart or insulin lispro in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, 161 adults with T1D (18–79 years old, baseline HbA1c 5.5%–13.1%, 32% using...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes technology & therapeutics 2022-10, Vol.24 (10), p.697-711
Hauptverfasser: Kruger, Davida, Kass, Alex, Lonier, Jacqueline, Pettus, Jeremy, Raskin, Philip, Salam, Maamoun, Trikudanathan, Subbulaxmi, Zhou, Keren, Russell, Steven J., Damiano, Edward R., El-Khatib, Firas H., Ruedy, Katrina J., Balliro, Courtney, Li, Zoey, Marak, Martin Chase, Calhoun, Peter, Beck, Roy W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: To evaluate the insulin-only configuration of the iLet® bionic pancreas (BP) using insulin aspart or insulin lispro in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, 161 adults with T1D (18–79 years old, baseline HbA1c 5.5%–13.1%, 32% using multiple daily injections, 27% using a pump without automation, 5% using a pump with predictive low glucose suspend, and 36% using a hybrid closed loop system before the study) were randomly assigned 2:1 to use the BP (N = 107) with insulin aspart or insulin lispro (BP group) or a standard-of-care (SC) control group (N = 54) using their usual insulin delivery plus continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). The primary outcome was HbA1c at 13 weeks. Results: Mean HbA1c decreased from 7.6% ± 1.2% at baseline to 7.1% ± 0.6% at 13 weeks with BP versus 7.6% ± 1.2% to 7.5% ± 0.9% with SC (adjusted difference = −0.5%, 95% confidence interval −0.6% to −0.3%, P 250 mg/dL, and standard deviation of CGM glucose all favored the BP group (P 
ISSN:1520-9156
1557-8593
DOI:10.1089/dia.2022.0200