Gender Differences in Physical Activity Engagement Among Adolescents With Congenital Heart Disease

OBJECTIVEThe current study aimed to (a) describe moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), sedentary behavior (SB), and cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2Peak) via objective assessment among adolescents with congenital heart disease (CHD), (b) examine gender differences on MVPA, SB, VO2Peak, and the Theory of Planned Behavior elements, and (c) identify whether gender moderates the relationships between the Theory of Planned Behavior elements and MVPA, SB, and VO2Peak. METHODSAdolescent CHD survivors (N = 86; ages 15-18 years) wore an accelerometer to assess MVPA and SB, underwent an exercise stress test to assess VO2Peak, and completed a survey of the Theory of Planned Behavior elements as measured by perceived benefits (attitudes), family/friend support and perceived norms (social norms), and self-efficacy and barriers (perceived behavioral control) to engaging in physical activity. RESULTSOn average, CHD survivors engaged in 22.3 min (SD = 15.3) of MVPA/day and 9 hr of SB/day (M = 565.8, SD = 102.5 min). Females engaged in less MVPA but not more SB had a lower mean VO2Peak, reported lower self-efficacy, and perceived greater barriers than males. In a regression model, barriers explained unique variance in MVPA and VO2Peak, but the relationship between barriers and MVPA/VO2Peak did not vary by gender. Self-efficacy did not explain unique variance in MVPA and VO2Peak when included in a model with gender and barriers. CONCLUSIONSFamily/friend support for physical activity engagement may be an important consideration when developing physical activity interventions for adolescent CHD survivors. The role of gender differences in self-efficacy and perceived barriers on physical activity engagement warrants further investigation.