Diagnostic performance of dedicated breast positron emission tomography

Background Dedicated breast positron emission tomography (dbPET) has been developed for detecting smaller breast cancer. We investigated the diagnostic performance of dbPET in patients with known breast cancer. Methods Eighty-two preoperative patients with breast cancer were included in the study (8...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) Japan), 2022-11, Vol.29 (6), p.1013-1021
Hauptverfasser: Hashimoto, Rikako, Akashi-Tanaka, Sadako, Watanabe, Chie, Masuda, Hiroko, Taruno, Kanae, Takamaru, Tomoko, Ide, Yoshimi, Kuwayama, Takashi, Kobayashi, Yasuhiro, Takimoto, Masafumi, Nakamura, Seigo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Dedicated breast positron emission tomography (dbPET) has been developed for detecting smaller breast cancer. We investigated the diagnostic performance of dbPET in patients with known breast cancer. Methods Eighty-two preoperative patients with breast cancer were included in the study (84 tumours: 11 ductal carcinomas in situ [DCIS], 73 invasive cancers). They underwent mammography (MMG), ultrasonography (US), and contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before whole-body PET/MRI (WBPET/MRI) and dbPET. We evaluated the sensitivity of all modalities, and the association between the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) level and histopathological features. Results The sensitivities of MMG, US, MRI, WBPET/MRI and dbPET for all tumours were 81.2% (65/80), 98.8% (83/84), 98.6% (73/74), 86.9% (73/84), and 89.2% (75/84), respectively. For 11 DCIS and 22 small invasive cancers (≤ 2 cm), the sensitivity of dbPET (84.9%) tended to be higher than that of WBPET/MRI (69.7%) ( p  = 0.095). Seven tumours were detected by dbPET only, but not by WBPET/MRI. Five tumours were detected by only WBPET/MRI because of the blind area of dbPET detector, requiring a wider field of view. After making the mat of dbPET detector thinner, all 22 scanned tumours were depicted. The higher SUVmax of dbPET was significantly related to the negative oestrogen receptor status, higher nuclear grade, and higher Ki67 ( p  
ISSN:1340-6868
1880-4233
DOI:10.1007/s12282-022-01381-x