Emotion‐related impulsivity and suicidal ideation: Towards a more specific model

Objectives Suicidal ideation is a pervasive and painful experience that varies considerably in its phenomenology. Here, we consider how one key risk variable might inform our understanding of variation in suicidal ideation: emotion‐related impulsivity, the trait‐like tendency towards unconstrained s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of clinical psychology 2022-11, Vol.61 (4), p.1219-1235
Hauptverfasser: Anvar, Sarah, Swerdlow, Benjamin A., Jobes, David, Timpano, Kiara R., Mandel, Abby Adler, Kleiman, Evan, Joiner, Thomas, Johnson, Sheri L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives Suicidal ideation is a pervasive and painful experience that varies considerably in its phenomenology. Here, we consider how one key risk variable might inform our understanding of variation in suicidal ideation: emotion‐related impulsivity, the trait‐like tendency towards unconstrained speech, behaviour, and cognition in the face of intense emotions. We hypothesized that emotion‐related impulsivity would be tied to specific features, including severity, perceived lack of controllability, more rapidly fluctuating course, higher scores on a measure of acute suicidal affective disturbance, and more emotional and cognitive disturbance as antecedents. Methods We recruited two samples of adults (Ns = 421, 221) through Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), with oversampling of those with suicidal ideation. Both samples completed psychometrically sound self‐report measures online to assess emotion‐ and non‐emotion‐related dimensions of impulsivity and characteristics of suicidal ideation. Results One form of emotion‐related impulsivity related to the severity, uncontrollability, dynamic course, and affective and cognitive precursors of ideation. Conclusions Despite limitations of the cross‐sectional design and self‐report measures, the current findings highlight the importance of specificity in considering key dimensions of impulsivity and suicidal ideation.
ISSN:0144-6657
2044-8260
DOI:10.1111/bjc.12383