Health effects associated with smoking: a Burden of Proof study

As a leading behavioral risk factor for numerous health outcomes, smoking is a major ongoing public health challenge. Although evidence on the health effects of smoking has been widely reported, few attempts have evaluated the dose–response relationship between smoking and a diverse range of health...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature medicine 2022-10, Vol.28 (10), p.2045-2055
Hauptverfasser: Dai, Xiaochen, Gil, Gabriela F., Reitsma, Marissa B., Ahmad, Noah S., Anderson, Jason A., Bisignano, Catherine, Carr, Sinclair, Feldman, Rachel, Hay, Simon I., He, Jiawei, Iannucci, Vincent, Lawlor, Hilary R., Malloy, Matthew J., Marczak, Laurie B., McLaughlin, Susan A., Morikawa, Larissa, Mullany, Erin C., Nicholson, Sneha I., O’Connell, Erin M., Okereke, Chukwuma, Sorensen, Reed J. D., Whisnant, Joanna, Aravkin, Aleksandr Y., Zheng, Peng, Murray, Christopher J. L., Gakidou, Emmanuela
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:As a leading behavioral risk factor for numerous health outcomes, smoking is a major ongoing public health challenge. Although evidence on the health effects of smoking has been widely reported, few attempts have evaluated the dose–response relationship between smoking and a diverse range of health outcomes systematically and comprehensively. In the present study, we re-estimated the dose–response relationships between current smoking and 36 health outcomes by conducting systematic reviews up to 31 May 2022, employing a meta-analytic method that incorporates between-study heterogeneity into estimates of uncertainty. Among the 36 selected outcomes, 8 had strong-to-very-strong evidence of an association with smoking, 21 had weak-to-moderate evidence of association and 7 had no evidence of association. By overcoming many of the limitations of traditional meta-analyses, our approach provides comprehensive, up-to-date and easy-to-use estimates of the evidence on the health effects of smoking. These estimates provide important information for tobacco control advocates, policy makers, researchers, physicians, smokers and the public. A meta-analysis using the Burden of proof method reported consistent evidence supporting harmful associations between smoking and 28 different health outcomes.
ISSN:1078-8956
1546-170X
1546-170X
DOI:10.1038/s41591-022-01978-x