Clinical intervention of a tighter-than-tolerated fit of aesthetic hand and finger prosthesis via controlled silicone swelling: A novel, speedier and versatile alternative method

A tighter-than-tolerated fit of aesthetic hand prosthesis is conventionally rectified by stretching the affected segment to plastic deformation. This method is not only time-consuming, but also ineffective in stretching irregular, non-cylindrical prosthesis segments apart from the “wrist and digits”...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine (Baltimore) 2022-10, Vol.101 (40), p.e30885-e30885
Hauptverfasser: Leow, Michael E.L., Le, Lan Anh T., Chan, Yiong Huak, Chong, Alphonsus K.S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A tighter-than-tolerated fit of aesthetic hand prosthesis is conventionally rectified by stretching the affected segment to plastic deformation. This method is not only time-consuming, but also ineffective in stretching irregular, non-cylindrical prosthesis segments apart from the “wrist and digits”. This study investigates controlled silicone swelling as an alternative method of expanding aesthetic hand and finger prosthesis to address a tight fit. The technique of “controlled” swelling that minimizes oil uptake to as little as is necessary to achieve the desired magnitude of elastomer expansion was demonstrated using experimental test samples. Brush-coats of a cosmetics-grade oil, KF-96A-10CS, 2 a time, were applied on CosmesilTM samples to obtain elastomer expansion. The same technique of staggered oil delivery was used on tight-fitting segments of patients’ prosthesis, with test-fitting of each incremental expansion till satisfactory outcomes were achieved. Percentage circumference increases in swelled test samples and in all rectified/ patients’ prostheses were then compared to validate the effectiveness of the method. Circumference increases in the test samples after each 2 coats were significantly different (P 
ISSN:1536-5964
0025-7974
1536-5964
DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000030885