Lung ultrasound versus chest computed tomography for pregnant inpatients with COVID‐19

Purpose To compare lung ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) in the assessment of pregnant women with COVID‐19. Methods Prospective study comprising 39 pregnant inpatients with COVID‐19 who underwent pulmonary assessment with CT and US with a maximum span of 48 h between the exams. The thorax was divided into 12 regions and assessed in terms of the following: the presence of B‐lines (>2), coalescent B‐lines, consolidation on US; presence of interlobular thickening, ground glass, consolidation on CT. The two methods were scored by adding up the scores from each thoracic region. Results A significant correlation was found between the scores obtained by the two methods (rICC = 0.946; p