A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study of High-Dose Vitamin C Plus FOLFOX ± Bevacizumab versus FOLFOX ± Bevacizumab in Unresectable Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (VITALITY Study)

To compare the efficacy and safety of high-dose vitamin C plus FOLFOX ± bevacizumab versus FOLFOX ± bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Between 2017 and 2019, histologically confirmed patients with mCRC (n = 442) with normal glucose-6-phosphate d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical cancer research 2022-10, Vol.28 (19), p.4232-4239
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Feng, He, Ming-Ming, Xiao, Jian, Zhang, Yan-Qiao, Yuan, Xiang-Lin, Fang, Wei-Jia, Zhang, Yan, Wang, Wei, Hu, Xiao-Hua, Ma, Zhi-Gang, Yao, Yi-Chen, Zhuang, Zhi-Xiang, Zhou, Fu-Xiang, Ying, Jie-Er, Yuan, Ying, Zou, Qing-Feng, Guo, Zeng-Qing, Wu, Xiang-Yuan, Jin, Ying, Mai, Zong-Jiong, Wang, Zhi-Qiang, Qiu, Hong, Guo, Ying, Shi, Si-Mei, Chen, Shuang-Zhen, Luo, Hui-Yan, Zhang, Dong-Sheng, Wang, Feng-Hua, Li, Yu-Hong, Xu, Rui-Hua
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To compare the efficacy and safety of high-dose vitamin C plus FOLFOX ± bevacizumab versus FOLFOX ± bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Between 2017 and 2019, histologically confirmed patients with mCRC (n = 442) with normal glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase status and no prior treatment for metastatic disease were randomized (1:1) into a control (FOLFOX ± bevacizumab) and an experimental [high-dose vitamin C (1.5 g/kg/d, intravenously for 3 hours from D1 to D3) plus FOLFOX ± bevacizumab] group. Randomization was based on the primary tumor location and bevacizumab prescription. The progression-free survival (PFS) of the experimental group was not superior to the control group [median PFS, 8.6 vs. 8.3 months; HR, 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70-1.05; P = 0.1]. The objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) of the experimental and control groups were similar (ORR, 44.3% vs. 42.1%; P = 0.9; median OS, 20.7 vs. 19.7 months; P = 0.7). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 33.5% and 30.3% of patients in the experimental and control groups, respectively. In prespecified subgroup analyses, patients with RAS mutation had significantly longer PFS (median PFS, 9.2 vs. 7.8 months; HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50-0.91; P = 0.01) with vitamin C added to chemotherapy than with chemotherapy only. High-dose vitamin C plus chemotherapy failed to show superior PFS compared with chemotherapy in patients with mCRC as first-line treatment but may be beneficial in patients with mCRC harboring RAS mutation.
ISSN:1078-0432
1557-3265
DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-0655