Radiation Oncology Virtual Education Rotation (ROVER) 2.0 for Residents: Implementation and Outcomes

The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed the integration of a virtual education curriculum to support radiation oncologists in training. We report outcomes from Radiation Oncology Virtual Education Rotation (ROVER) 2.0, a supplementary virtual educational curriculum created for radiation oncology residents g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cancer education 2023-06, Vol.38 (3), p.977-984
Hauptverfasser: Sandhu, Navjot K., Rahimy, Elham, Hutten, Ryan, Shukla, Utkarsh, Rajkumar-Calkins, Anne, Miller, Jacob A., Von Eyben, Rie, Deig, Christopher R., Obeid, Jean-Pierre, Jimenez, Rachel B., Fields, Emma C., Pollom, Erqi L., Kahn, Jenna M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed the integration of a virtual education curriculum to support radiation oncologists in training. We report outcomes from Radiation Oncology Virtual Education Rotation (ROVER) 2.0, a supplementary virtual educational curriculum created for radiation oncology residents globally. A prospective cohort of residents completed surveys before and after the live virtual webinar sessions (pre- and post-surveys, respectively). Live sessions were structured as complex gray-zone cases across various core disease sites. Resident demographics and responses were summarized using means, standard deviations, and proportions. Nine ROVER sessions were held from October 2020 to June 2021. A total of 1487 registered residents completed the pre-survey, of which 786 attended the live case discussion and 223 completed post-surveys. A total of 479 unique radiation oncology residents (of which 95, n  = 19.8%, were international attendees) from 147 institutions (national, n  = 81, 55.1%; international, n  = 66, 44.9%) participated in the sessions. There was similar participation across post-graduate year (PGY) 2 through 5 (range n  = 86 to n  = 105). Of the 122 unique resident post-surveys, nearly all reported learning through the virtual structure as “very easy” or “easy” (97.5%, n  = 119). A majority rated the ROVER 2.0 educational sessions to be “valuable or “very valuable” (99.2%, n  = 121), and the panelists-attendee interaction as “appropriate” (97.5%, n  = 119). Virtual live didactics aimed at radiation oncology residents are feasible. These results suggest that the adoption of the ROVER 2.0 curricula may help improve radiation oncology resident education.
ISSN:0885-8195
1543-0154
DOI:10.1007/s13187-022-02216-1