Radiation Oncology Virtual Education Rotation (ROVER) 2.0 for Residents: Implementation and Outcomes
The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed the integration of a virtual education curriculum to support radiation oncologists in training. We report outcomes from Radiation Oncology Virtual Education Rotation (ROVER) 2.0, a supplementary virtual educational curriculum created for radiation oncology residents g...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cancer education 2023-06, Vol.38 (3), p.977-984 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed the integration of a virtual education curriculum to support radiation oncologists in training. We report outcomes from Radiation Oncology Virtual Education Rotation (ROVER) 2.0, a supplementary virtual educational curriculum created for radiation oncology residents globally. A prospective cohort of residents completed surveys before and after the live virtual webinar sessions (pre- and post-surveys, respectively). Live sessions were structured as complex gray-zone cases across various core disease sites. Resident demographics and responses were summarized using means, standard deviations, and proportions. Nine ROVER sessions were held from October 2020 to June 2021. A total of 1487 registered residents completed the pre-survey, of which 786 attended the live case discussion and 223 completed post-surveys. A total of 479 unique radiation oncology residents (of which 95,
n
= 19.8%, were international attendees) from 147 institutions (national,
n
= 81, 55.1%; international,
n
= 66, 44.9%) participated in the sessions. There was similar participation across post-graduate year (PGY) 2 through 5 (range
n
= 86 to
n
= 105). Of the 122 unique resident post-surveys, nearly all reported learning through the virtual structure as “very easy” or “easy” (97.5%,
n
= 119). A majority rated the ROVER 2.0 educational sessions to be “valuable or “very valuable” (99.2%,
n
= 121), and the panelists-attendee interaction as “appropriate” (97.5%,
n
= 119). Virtual live didactics aimed at radiation oncology residents are feasible. These results suggest that the adoption of the ROVER 2.0 curricula may help improve radiation oncology resident education. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0885-8195 1543-0154 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s13187-022-02216-1 |