Open surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of staghorn calculi

BACKGROUNDFor urologists, treating staghorn stones remains a difficult challenge. Various studies have evaluated the results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and open surgery in different populations but these results were controversial. Here, we aimed to compare and evaluate the results of open surgery and PCNL in the treatment of staghorn stones. METHODSThis retrospective descriptive study was performed to compare the results of open surgery and PCNL in the treatment of staghorn stones in 2013-2021. A total of 360 participants were studied among the population. Demographic data of patients including age, gender, and comorbidities were obtained. We assessed variables including type of stone, serum creatinine, degree of hydronephrosis, and urine culture before the operation. All participants in our study were informed of the two surgical alternatives. RESULTSThe mean length of hospital stay in PCNL patients was 3.88 ± 1.76 and in open surgery patients was 5.858 ± 2.12 (P = 0.003). In 30 patients (13.9%) in the PCNL group and 27 patients (18.8%) in the open surgery group, bleeding necessitating blood transfusion was the only intraoperative complication. 309 patients (85%) had no residual stones at the time of discharge from the hospital, which was 81.9% (177 cases) in patients treated with PCNL and 91.6% (132 patients) in the open surgery group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONStaghorn calculi can be managed effectively with open surgery or PCNL. Given the reduced postoperative complication rate and higher stone-free rate, we believe open surgery is better technique for complicated staghorn stones with a high burden.