Early and midterm patency of arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis access using different techniques and their advantages and disadvantages

This descriptive retrospective study was done to observe the different techniques of arteriovenous fistula creation for advantages and disadvantages, complications, and early and midterm patency. Fifty-three arteriovenous fistulas were created from September 2018 to August 2020 using four different techniques. Radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula was usually the first option. Other techniques like brachio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula, radio-basilic arteriovenous fistula, and brachio-basilic arteriovenous fistula were used when the radio-cephalic fistula had thrombosed or could not be constructed due to small-sized cephalic vein in the forearm. The majority of patients (41 (77.35%)) underwent radio-cephalic fistula creation. Early patency was 38 (92.7%) in the radio-cephalic technique whereas it was 12 (100%) in the radio-basilic, brachio-cephalic, and brachio-basilic techniques combined. The midterm patency was 32 (78%) in the radio-cephalic technique, 5 (83%) in the brachio-cephalic technique, 3 (75%) in the radio-basilic technique, and 1 (50%) in the brachio-basilic technique. Radio-basilic and brachio-cephalic are alternative techniques for fistula creation after radio-cephalic depending upon the size of the basilic vein in the forearm or cephalic vein in the cubital fossa or arm. The radio-basilic technique may have advantages over the brachio-cephalic technique which need to be further evaluated. Proximal fistulas like brachio-basilic and brachio-cephalic are more commonly associated with limb edema.