Application of a cost-effectiveness analysis of pathogen-specific vaccines against gastroenteritis to a military population in a developing country setting

•Vaccine cost-effectiveness modeling can inform LMIC military health policies.•Enteropathogen vaccines may be cost-effective for special LMIC adult populations.•Shigella and norovirus vaccines appear cost-effective for Peruvian troops. Vaccine implementation planning in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) often focuses on children without considering special adult populations. We adapted an economic model developed by the United States Department of Defense (DoD) to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vaccine acquisition strategies for Campylobacter-, ETEC-, Shigella-, and norovirus-associated gastroenteritis. We compared implementation costs with current medical management in the Peruvian armed forces, a special population of low- and middle-income (LMIC) adults with a high incidence of infectious gastroenteritis. Pathogen-specific vaccine implementation resulted in calculated cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) per duty day lost averted (CERDDL) of $13,741; $1,272; $301; and $803, and a CER per diarrhea day averted of $2,130; $215; $51; and $199 for Campylobacter, ETEC, Shigella, and norovirus, respectively. These estimates compare favorably to CERDDL estimates from high-income military population and suggest that implementing vaccines gastroenteritis may be cost-effective in the Peruvian military population.