A comparative study of mechanisms of the adsorption of CO2 confined within graphene-MoS2 nanosheets: a DFT trend study

The space within the interlayer of 2-dimensional (2D) nanosheets provides new and intriguing confined environments for molecular interactions. However, atomic level understanding of the adsorption mechanism of CO 2 confined within the interlayer of 2D nanosheets is still limited. Herein, we present...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nanoscale advances 2019-04, Vol.1 (4), p.1442-1451
Hauptverfasser: Enujekwu, Francis M, Ezeh, Collins I, George, Michael W, Xu, Mengxia, Do, Hainam, Zhang, Yue, Zhao, Haitao, Wu, Tao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The space within the interlayer of 2-dimensional (2D) nanosheets provides new and intriguing confined environments for molecular interactions. However, atomic level understanding of the adsorption mechanism of CO 2 confined within the interlayer of 2D nanosheets is still limited. Herein, we present a comparative study of the adsorption mechanisms of CO 2 confined within graphene–molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 ) nanosheets using density functional theory (DFT). A comprehensive analysis of CO 2 adsorption energies ( E AE ) at various interlayer spacings of different multilayer structures comprising graphene/graphene (GrapheneB) and MoS 2 /MoS 2 (MoS 2 B) bilayers as well as graphene/MoS 2 (GMoS 2 ) and MoS 2 /graphene (MoS 2 G) hybrids is performed to obtain the most stable adsorption configurations. It was found that 7.5 Å and 8.5 Å interlayer spacings are the most stable conformations for CO 2 adsorption on the bilayer and hybrid structures, respectively. Adsorption energies of the multilayer structures decreased in the following trend: MoS 2 B > GrapheneB > MoS 2 G > GMoS 2 . By incorporating van der Waals (vdW) interactions between the CO 2 molecule and the surfaces, we find that CO 2 binds more strongly on these multilayer structures. Furthermore, there is a slight discrepancy in the binding energies of CO 2 adsorption on the heterostructures (GMoS 2 , MoS 2 G) due to the modality of the atom arrangement (C–Mo–S–O and Mo–S–O–C) in both structures, indicating that conformational anisotropy determines to a certain degree its CO 2 adsorption energy. Meanwhile, Bader charge analysis shows that the interaction between CO 2 and these surfaces causes charge transfer and redistributions. By contrast, the density of states (DOS) plots show that CO 2 physisorption does not have a substantial effect on the electronic properties of graphene and MoS 2 . In summary, the results obtained in this study could serve as useful guidance in the preparation of graphene–MoS 2 nanosheets for the improved adsorption efficiency of CO 2 . The space within the interlayer of 2-dimensional (2D) nanosheets provides new and intriguing confined environments for molecular interactions.
ISSN:2516-0230
DOI:10.1039/c8na00314a