Simultaneous 18F-FDG-PET/MRI for the detection of periprosthetic joint infections after knee or hip arthroplasty: a prospective feasibility study

Purpose This study investigated the diagnostic value of simultaneous 18 F-fluordeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) in suspected periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee. Methods Sixteen prostheses from 13 patients with suspected PJI were pro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International orthopaedics 2022-09, Vol.46 (9), p.1921-1928
Hauptverfasser: Henkelmann, Jeanette, Henkelmann, Ralf, Denecke, Timm, Zajonz, Dirk, Roth, Andreas, Sabri, Osama, Purz, Sandra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose This study investigated the diagnostic value of simultaneous 18 F-fluordeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) in suspected periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee. Methods Sixteen prostheses from 13 patients with suspected PJI were prospectively examined using PET/MRI. Image datasets were evaluated in consensus by a radiologist and a nuclear physician for the overall diagnosis of ‘PJI’ (yes/no) and its anatomical involvement, such as the periprosthetic bone margin, bone marrow, and soft tissue. The imaging results were compared with the reference standard obtained from surgical or biopsy specimens and subjected to statistical analysis. Results Using the reference standard, ten out of the 13 prostheses (ten hips, threes knees) were diagnosed with PJI. Using PET/MRI, every patient with PJI was correctly diagnosed (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 100%). Considering the anatomical regions, the sensitivity and specificity were 57% and 50% in the periprosthetic bone margin, 75% and 33% in the bone marrow, and 100% and 100% in the soft tissue. Conclusion PET/MRI can be reliably used for the diagnosis of PJI. However, assessment of the periprosthetic bone remains difficult due to the presence of artefacts. Thus, currently, this modality is unlikely to be recommended in clinical practice.
ISSN:0341-2695
1432-5195
DOI:10.1007/s00264-022-05445-7