Simultaneous 18F-FDG-PET/MRI for the detection of periprosthetic joint infections after knee or hip arthroplasty: a prospective feasibility study
Purpose This study investigated the diagnostic value of simultaneous 18 F-fluordeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) in suspected periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee. Methods Sixteen prostheses from 13 patients with suspected PJI were pro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International orthopaedics 2022-09, Vol.46 (9), p.1921-1928 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
This study investigated the diagnostic value of simultaneous
18
F-fluordeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) in suspected periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee.
Methods
Sixteen prostheses from 13 patients with suspected PJI were prospectively examined using PET/MRI. Image datasets were evaluated in consensus by a radiologist and a nuclear physician for the overall diagnosis of ‘PJI’ (yes/no) and its anatomical involvement, such as the periprosthetic bone margin, bone marrow, and soft tissue. The imaging results were compared with the reference standard obtained from surgical or biopsy specimens and subjected to statistical analysis.
Results
Using the reference standard, ten out of the 13 prostheses (ten hips, threes knees) were diagnosed with PJI. Using PET/MRI, every patient with PJI was correctly diagnosed (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 100%). Considering the anatomical regions, the sensitivity and specificity were 57% and 50% in the periprosthetic bone margin, 75% and 33% in the bone marrow, and 100% and 100% in the soft tissue.
Conclusion
PET/MRI can be reliably used for the diagnosis of PJI. However, assessment of the periprosthetic bone remains difficult due to the presence of artefacts. Thus, currently, this modality is unlikely to be recommended in clinical practice. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0341-2695 1432-5195 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00264-022-05445-7 |