Low back pain and telecommuting in Japan: Influence of work environment quality

Objectives This study examined the relationship between frequency of working from home and low back pain (LBP), considering the quality of work environment. Methods The study was based on a cross‐sectional internet‐based survey. Of 33 302 respondents, data from 12 774 desk workers were retained for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Occupational Health 2022-01, Vol.64 (1), p.e12329-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Matsugaki, Ryutaro, Ishimaru, Tomohiro, Hino, Ayako, Muramatsu, Keiji, Nagata, Tomohisa, Ikegami, Kazunori, Tateishi, Seiichiro, Tsuji, Mayumi, Matsuda, Shinya, Fujino, Yoshihisa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives This study examined the relationship between frequency of working from home and low back pain (LBP), considering the quality of work environment. Methods The study was based on a cross‐sectional internet‐based survey. Of 33 302 respondents, data from 12 774 desk workers were retained for analysis. We used a 0–10 numerical rating scale to assess LBP. Work environment was assessed using five subjective questions. Mixed‐effects logistic regression nested by city level was used to analyze the relationship between frequency of working from home and LBP, stratified by work environment condition. Results The prevalence of LBP was 21.0%. Among those reporting a poor work environment, as opposed to almost never working from home, the multivariate odds ratio (OR) of LBP were as follows: working from home less than 1 day per week: OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 0.89–1.76, p = .190; 2–3 days per week: OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.16–2.16, p = .004; and 4 or more days per week: OR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.38–2.40, p 
ISSN:1348-9585
1341-9145
1348-9585
DOI:10.1002/1348-9585.12329