Effects of Very Low Nicotine Content Cigarette use on Cigarette Reinforcement among Smokers with Serious Mental Illness

•People with serious mental illness (SMI) are highly vulnerable to tobacco use.•We used the CPT to investigate how VLNC cigarettes impact cigarette reinforcement.•At Week 6, intensity of demand and elasticity for study cigarettes differed by group.•VLNC cigarettes reduced cigarette demand for usual...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Addictive behaviors 2022-10, Vol.133, p.107376-107376, Article 107376
Hauptverfasser: DeAtley, Teresa E., Cassidy, Rachel, Snell, Morgan L., Colby, Suzanne M., Tidey, Jennifer W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•People with serious mental illness (SMI) are highly vulnerable to tobacco use.•We used the CPT to investigate how VLNC cigarettes impact cigarette reinforcement.•At Week 6, intensity of demand and elasticity for study cigarettes differed by group.•VLNC cigarettes reduced cigarette demand for usual brand cigarettes at Week 6.•A nicotine reduction policy may reduce cigarette reinforcement for people with SMI. Among people without psychiatric disorders who smoke, very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarette use reduces cigarette reinforcement. Whether this is true of people with serious mental illness (SMI) who smoke is unknown. Using a hypothetical purchase task, we compared the effects of 6-week use of VLNC versus normal nicotine content (NNC) cigarettes on study cigarette and usual brand (UB) cigarette reinforcement among people with SMI who smoke. After a baseline period of UB cigarette use, participants with SMI (n = 58) were randomized to use NNC cigarettes (15.8 mg nicotine/g tobacco) or VLNC cigarettes (0.4 mg/g) for 6 weeks. At Week 6, they completed the CPT for both their assigned study cigarette and UB. The groups were compared on demand intensity (number of cigarettes purchased at no cost) and elasticity (rate of decline in demand as price increases) using extra sum-of-squares F-tests. The effects of treatment on demand indices while controlling for covariates were assessed using hierarchical regression. At Week 6, intensity of demand for study cigarettes was lower and elasticity was higher for the VLNC group relative to the NNC group (p 
ISSN:0306-4603
1873-6327
DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107376