Phylogenomic analyses in Phrymaceae reveal extensive gene tree discordance in relationships among major clades
Premise Phylogenomic datasets using genomes and transcriptomes provide rich opportunities beyond resolving bifurcating phylogenetic relationships. Monkeyflower (Phrymaceae) is a model system for evolutionary ecology. However, it lacks a well‐supported phylogeny as a basis for a stable taxonomy and f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of botany 2022-06, Vol.109 (6), p.1035-1046 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1046 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1035 |
container_title | American journal of botany |
container_volume | 109 |
creator | Morales‐Briones, Diego F. Lin, Nan Huang, Eileen Y. Grossenbacher, Dena L. Sobel, James M. Gilmore, Caroline D. Tank, David C. Yang, Ya |
description | Premise
Phylogenomic datasets using genomes and transcriptomes provide rich opportunities beyond resolving bifurcating phylogenetic relationships. Monkeyflower (Phrymaceae) is a model system for evolutionary ecology. However, it lacks a well‐supported phylogeny as a basis for a stable taxonomy and for macroevolutionary comparisons.
Methods
We sampled 24 genomes and transcriptomes in Phrymaceae and closely related families, including eight newly sequenced transcriptomes. We reconstructed the phylogeny using IQ‐TREE and ASTRAL, evaluated gene tree discordance using PhyParts, Quartet Sampling, and a cloudogram, and carried out reticulation analyses using PhyloNet and HyDe. We searched for whole genome duplication (WGD) events using chromosome numbers, synonymous distances, and gene duplication events as evidence.
Results
Most gene trees support the monophyly of Phrymaceae and each of its tribes. Most gene trees also support tribe Mimuleae being sister to Phrymeae + Diplaceae + Leucocarpeae, with extensive gene tree discordance among the latter three. Despite the discordance, the monophyly of Mimulus s.l. is rejected, and no individual reticulation event among the Phrymaceae tribes is well‐supported. Reticulation likely occurred among Erythranthe bicolor and closely related species. No ancient WGD was detected in Phrymaceae. Instead, small‐scale duplications are among potential drivers of macroevolutionary diversification of Phrymaceae.
Conclusions
We show that analysis of reticulate evolution is sensitive to taxon sampling and methods used. We also demonstrate that phylogenomic datasets using genomes and transcriptomes present rich opportunities to investigate gene family evolution and genome duplication events involved in lineage diversification and adaptation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ajb2.1860 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9328367</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2683174199</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-10f84919e8244d75b7058aa42fe1ad1e9924bc4e989a888b6f8549deb4ce553a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EotvCgT-ALHGhh7S24yT2Bamt-FQleoCzNXEmu1459mJnF_LvSdhSARKn0WgeP5rxS8gLzi44Y-IStq244Kpmj8iKV2VTCK6bx2TF5mGhuRAn5DTn7dxqqcVTclJWshaS8xUJd5vJxzWGODhLIYCfMmbqAr3bpGkAi4A04QHBU_wxYsjugHTmkY4JkXYu25g6CBaXRwk9jC6GvHG7TGGIYU0H2MZErYcO8zPypAef8fl9PSNf3739cvOhuP38_uPN1W1hpSxZwVmvpOYalZCya6q2YZUCkKJHDh1HrYVsrUStNCil2rpXldQdttJiVZVQnpE3R-9u3w7YWQxjAm92yQ2QJhPBmb8nwW3MOh6MLoUq62YWvL4XpPhtj3k0w3wpeg8B4z4bUVcVZ0JVfEZf_YNu4z7NP7lQquSN5FrP1PmRsinmnLB_WIYzs6RolhTNkuLMvvxz-wfyd2wzcHkEvjuP0_9N5urTtfil_AlKVahu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2683174199</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phylogenomic analyses in Phrymaceae reveal extensive gene tree discordance in relationships among major clades</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Morales‐Briones, Diego F. ; Lin, Nan ; Huang, Eileen Y. ; Grossenbacher, Dena L. ; Sobel, James M. ; Gilmore, Caroline D. ; Tank, David C. ; Yang, Ya</creator><creatorcontrib>Morales‐Briones, Diego F. ; Lin, Nan ; Huang, Eileen Y. ; Grossenbacher, Dena L. ; Sobel, James M. ; Gilmore, Caroline D. ; Tank, David C. ; Yang, Ya</creatorcontrib><description>Premise
Phylogenomic datasets using genomes and transcriptomes provide rich opportunities beyond resolving bifurcating phylogenetic relationships. Monkeyflower (Phrymaceae) is a model system for evolutionary ecology. However, it lacks a well‐supported phylogeny as a basis for a stable taxonomy and for macroevolutionary comparisons.
Methods
We sampled 24 genomes and transcriptomes in Phrymaceae and closely related families, including eight newly sequenced transcriptomes. We reconstructed the phylogeny using IQ‐TREE and ASTRAL, evaluated gene tree discordance using PhyParts, Quartet Sampling, and a cloudogram, and carried out reticulation analyses using PhyloNet and HyDe. We searched for whole genome duplication (WGD) events using chromosome numbers, synonymous distances, and gene duplication events as evidence.
Results
Most gene trees support the monophyly of Phrymaceae and each of its tribes. Most gene trees also support tribe Mimuleae being sister to Phrymeae + Diplaceae + Leucocarpeae, with extensive gene tree discordance among the latter three. Despite the discordance, the monophyly of Mimulus s.l. is rejected, and no individual reticulation event among the Phrymaceae tribes is well‐supported. Reticulation likely occurred among Erythranthe bicolor and closely related species. No ancient WGD was detected in Phrymaceae. Instead, small‐scale duplications are among potential drivers of macroevolutionary diversification of Phrymaceae.
Conclusions
We show that analysis of reticulate evolution is sensitive to taxon sampling and methods used. We also demonstrate that phylogenomic datasets using genomes and transcriptomes present rich opportunities to investigate gene family evolution and genome duplication events involved in lineage diversification and adaptation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.1860</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35462411</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Botanical Society of America, Inc</publisher><subject>Chromosomes ; Datasets ; Diplacus ; Discordance ; Ecology ; Erythranthe ; Evolution ; Gene duplication ; Genomes ; Lamiales ; Mimulus ; Phrymaceae ; Phylogeny ; Reproduction (copying) ; reticulate evolution ; Sampling ; Taxonomy ; transcriptome ; Transcriptomes ; whole genome duplication</subject><ispartof>American journal of botany, 2022-06, Vol.109 (6), p.1035-1046</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Botanical Society of America.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. American Journal of Botany published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Botanical Society of America.</rights><rights>Copyright Botanical Society of America, Inc. Jun 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-10f84919e8244d75b7058aa42fe1ad1e9924bc4e989a888b6f8549deb4ce553a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-10f84919e8244d75b7058aa42fe1ad1e9924bc4e989a888b6f8549deb4ce553a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6221-0984 ; 0000-0003-1535-5739</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fajb2.1860$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fajb2.1860$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35462411$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morales‐Briones, Diego F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Eileen Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossenbacher, Dena L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobel, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilmore, Caroline D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tank, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Ya</creatorcontrib><title>Phylogenomic analyses in Phrymaceae reveal extensive gene tree discordance in relationships among major clades</title><title>American journal of botany</title><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><description>Premise
Phylogenomic datasets using genomes and transcriptomes provide rich opportunities beyond resolving bifurcating phylogenetic relationships. Monkeyflower (Phrymaceae) is a model system for evolutionary ecology. However, it lacks a well‐supported phylogeny as a basis for a stable taxonomy and for macroevolutionary comparisons.
Methods
We sampled 24 genomes and transcriptomes in Phrymaceae and closely related families, including eight newly sequenced transcriptomes. We reconstructed the phylogeny using IQ‐TREE and ASTRAL, evaluated gene tree discordance using PhyParts, Quartet Sampling, and a cloudogram, and carried out reticulation analyses using PhyloNet and HyDe. We searched for whole genome duplication (WGD) events using chromosome numbers, synonymous distances, and gene duplication events as evidence.
Results
Most gene trees support the monophyly of Phrymaceae and each of its tribes. Most gene trees also support tribe Mimuleae being sister to Phrymeae + Diplaceae + Leucocarpeae, with extensive gene tree discordance among the latter three. Despite the discordance, the monophyly of Mimulus s.l. is rejected, and no individual reticulation event among the Phrymaceae tribes is well‐supported. Reticulation likely occurred among Erythranthe bicolor and closely related species. No ancient WGD was detected in Phrymaceae. Instead, small‐scale duplications are among potential drivers of macroevolutionary diversification of Phrymaceae.
Conclusions
We show that analysis of reticulate evolution is sensitive to taxon sampling and methods used. We also demonstrate that phylogenomic datasets using genomes and transcriptomes present rich opportunities to investigate gene family evolution and genome duplication events involved in lineage diversification and adaptation.</description><subject>Chromosomes</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Diplacus</subject><subject>Discordance</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Erythranthe</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Gene duplication</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Lamiales</subject><subject>Mimulus</subject><subject>Phrymaceae</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Reproduction (copying)</subject><subject>reticulate evolution</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>transcriptome</subject><subject>Transcriptomes</subject><subject>whole genome duplication</subject><issn>0002-9122</issn><issn>1537-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EotvCgT-ALHGhh7S24yT2Bamt-FQleoCzNXEmu1459mJnF_LvSdhSARKn0WgeP5rxS8gLzi44Y-IStq244Kpmj8iKV2VTCK6bx2TF5mGhuRAn5DTn7dxqqcVTclJWshaS8xUJd5vJxzWGODhLIYCfMmbqAr3bpGkAi4A04QHBU_wxYsjugHTmkY4JkXYu25g6CBaXRwk9jC6GvHG7TGGIYU0H2MZErYcO8zPypAef8fl9PSNf3739cvOhuP38_uPN1W1hpSxZwVmvpOYalZCya6q2YZUCkKJHDh1HrYVsrUStNCil2rpXldQdttJiVZVQnpE3R-9u3w7YWQxjAm92yQ2QJhPBmb8nwW3MOh6MLoUq62YWvL4XpPhtj3k0w3wpeg8B4z4bUVcVZ0JVfEZf_YNu4z7NP7lQquSN5FrP1PmRsinmnLB_WIYzs6RolhTNkuLMvvxz-wfyd2wzcHkEvjuP0_9N5urTtfil_AlKVahu</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Morales‐Briones, Diego F.</creator><creator>Lin, Nan</creator><creator>Huang, Eileen Y.</creator><creator>Grossenbacher, Dena L.</creator><creator>Sobel, James M.</creator><creator>Gilmore, Caroline D.</creator><creator>Tank, David C.</creator><creator>Yang, Ya</creator><general>Botanical Society of America, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6221-0984</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1535-5739</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Phylogenomic analyses in Phrymaceae reveal extensive gene tree discordance in relationships among major clades</title><author>Morales‐Briones, Diego F. ; Lin, Nan ; Huang, Eileen Y. ; Grossenbacher, Dena L. ; Sobel, James M. ; Gilmore, Caroline D. ; Tank, David C. ; Yang, Ya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-10f84919e8244d75b7058aa42fe1ad1e9924bc4e989a888b6f8549deb4ce553a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Chromosomes</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Diplacus</topic><topic>Discordance</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Erythranthe</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Gene duplication</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Lamiales</topic><topic>Mimulus</topic><topic>Phrymaceae</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Reproduction (copying)</topic><topic>reticulate evolution</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>transcriptome</topic><topic>Transcriptomes</topic><topic>whole genome duplication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morales‐Briones, Diego F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Eileen Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossenbacher, Dena L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobel, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilmore, Caroline D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tank, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Ya</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morales‐Briones, Diego F.</au><au>Lin, Nan</au><au>Huang, Eileen Y.</au><au>Grossenbacher, Dena L.</au><au>Sobel, James M.</au><au>Gilmore, Caroline D.</au><au>Tank, David C.</au><au>Yang, Ya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phylogenomic analyses in Phrymaceae reveal extensive gene tree discordance in relationships among major clades</atitle><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1035</spage><epage>1046</epage><pages>1035-1046</pages><issn>0002-9122</issn><eissn>1537-2197</eissn><abstract>Premise
Phylogenomic datasets using genomes and transcriptomes provide rich opportunities beyond resolving bifurcating phylogenetic relationships. Monkeyflower (Phrymaceae) is a model system for evolutionary ecology. However, it lacks a well‐supported phylogeny as a basis for a stable taxonomy and for macroevolutionary comparisons.
Methods
We sampled 24 genomes and transcriptomes in Phrymaceae and closely related families, including eight newly sequenced transcriptomes. We reconstructed the phylogeny using IQ‐TREE and ASTRAL, evaluated gene tree discordance using PhyParts, Quartet Sampling, and a cloudogram, and carried out reticulation analyses using PhyloNet and HyDe. We searched for whole genome duplication (WGD) events using chromosome numbers, synonymous distances, and gene duplication events as evidence.
Results
Most gene trees support the monophyly of Phrymaceae and each of its tribes. Most gene trees also support tribe Mimuleae being sister to Phrymeae + Diplaceae + Leucocarpeae, with extensive gene tree discordance among the latter three. Despite the discordance, the monophyly of Mimulus s.l. is rejected, and no individual reticulation event among the Phrymaceae tribes is well‐supported. Reticulation likely occurred among Erythranthe bicolor and closely related species. No ancient WGD was detected in Phrymaceae. Instead, small‐scale duplications are among potential drivers of macroevolutionary diversification of Phrymaceae.
Conclusions
We show that analysis of reticulate evolution is sensitive to taxon sampling and methods used. We also demonstrate that phylogenomic datasets using genomes and transcriptomes present rich opportunities to investigate gene family evolution and genome duplication events involved in lineage diversification and adaptation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Botanical Society of America, Inc</pub><pmid>35462411</pmid><doi>10.1002/ajb2.1860</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6221-0984</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1535-5739</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9122 |
ispartof | American journal of botany, 2022-06, Vol.109 (6), p.1035-1046 |
issn | 0002-9122 1537-2197 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9328367 |
source | Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Chromosomes Datasets Diplacus Discordance Ecology Erythranthe Evolution Gene duplication Genomes Lamiales Mimulus Phrymaceae Phylogeny Reproduction (copying) reticulate evolution Sampling Taxonomy transcriptome Transcriptomes whole genome duplication |
title | Phylogenomic analyses in Phrymaceae reveal extensive gene tree discordance in relationships among major clades |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T20%3A23%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phylogenomic%20analyses%20in%20Phrymaceae%20reveal%20extensive%20gene%20tree%20discordance%20in%20relationships%20among%20major%20clades&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20botany&rft.au=Morales%E2%80%90Briones,%20Diego%20F.&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1035&rft.epage=1046&rft.pages=1035-1046&rft.issn=0002-9122&rft.eissn=1537-2197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ajb2.1860&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2683174199%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2683174199&rft_id=info:pmid/35462411&rfr_iscdi=true |