The role of keratinized mucosa width as a risk factor for peri‐implant disease: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and trial sequential analysis

Background Studies have examined the benefit of having keratinized peri‐implant mucosa width with mixed results. Purpose This study examines whether the lack of a prespecified (2 mm) amount of keratinized mucosa width (KMW) is a risk factor for peri‐implant diseases. Methods A systematic electronic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2022-06, Vol.24 (3), p.287-300
Hauptverfasser: Ravidà, Andrea, Arena, Claudia, Tattan, Mustafa, Caponio, Vito Carlo Alberto, Saleh, Muhammad H. A., Wang, Hom‐Lay, Troiano, Giuseppe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Studies have examined the benefit of having keratinized peri‐implant mucosa width with mixed results. Purpose This study examines whether the lack of a prespecified (2 mm) amount of keratinized mucosa width (KMW) is a risk factor for peri‐implant diseases. Methods A systematic electronic and manual search of randomized or nonrandomized controlled or noncontrolled clinical trials was conducted. Qualitative review, quantitative meta‐analysis, and trial sequence analysis (TSA) of implants inserted at sites with  0.05) and a low power of evidence were found for probing depth, soft‐tissue recession, and marginal bone loss. A significant difference favoring ≥2 mm KMW had a lower mean plaque index (MD = 0.37, 95% CI: [0.16, 0.58], p = 0.002) (3 studies, 430 implants, low‐quality evidence). GRADE system showed very low and low quality of evidence for all other outcome measures. Conclusion Based on the available studies, the impact of amount of KMW (either
ISSN:1523-0899
1708-8208
DOI:10.1111/cid.13080