Heterotrimetallic Double Cavity Cages: Syntheses and Selective Guest Binding

A strategy for the generation of heterotrimetallic double cavity (DC) cages [PdnPtmL4]6+ (DC1: n=1, m=2; and DC2: n=2, m=1) is reported. The DC cages were generated by combining an inert platinum(II) tetrapyridylaldehyde complex with a suitably substituted pyridylamine and PdII ions. 1H and DOSY nuc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2022-04, Vol.61 (18), p.e202201700-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Lisboa, Lynn S., Preston, Dan, McAdam, C. John, Wright, L. James, Hartinger, Christian G., Crowley, James D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A strategy for the generation of heterotrimetallic double cavity (DC) cages [PdnPtmL4]6+ (DC1: n=1, m=2; and DC2: n=2, m=1) is reported. The DC cages were generated by combining an inert platinum(II) tetrapyridylaldehyde complex with a suitably substituted pyridylamine and PdII ions. 1H and DOSY nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESIMS) data were consistent with the formation of the DC architectures. DC1 and DC2 were shown to interact with several different guest molecules. The structure of DC1, which features two identical cavities, binding two 2,6‐diaminoanthraquinone (DAQ) guest molecules was determined by single‐crystal X‐ray crystallography. In addition, DC1 was shown to bind two molecules of 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) in a statistical (non‐cooperative) manner. In contrast, DC2, which features two different cage cavities, was found to interact with two different guests, 5‐FU and cisplatin, selectively. A method for the synthesis of two heterotrimetallic double cavity cages, [PdnPtmL4]6+, (where n=1 and m =2 or n=2 and m=1) is described. The cages are shown to interact with several different guest molecules. The cage with two identical cavities can bind two identical guest molecules in a non‐cooperative fashion, whereas the cage with two different cavities can bind two different guests in a segregated manner.
ISSN:1433-7851
1521-3773
1521-3773
DOI:10.1002/anie.202201700