Targeted proteomics for evaluating risk of venous thrombosis following traumatic lower‐leg injury or knee arthroscopy

Introduction Patients with lower‐leg cast immobilization and patients undergoing knee arthroscopy have an increased risk of venous thrombosis (VT). Guidelines are ambiguous about thromboprophylaxis use, and individual risk factors for developing VT are often ignored. To assist in VT risk stratificat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis 2022-03, Vol.20 (3), p.684-699
Hauptverfasser: Mohammed, Yassene, Touw, Carolina E., Nemeth, Banne, van Adrichem, Raymond A., Borchers, Christoph H., Rosendaal, Frits R., van Vlijmen, Bart J., Cannegieter, Suzanne C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Patients with lower‐leg cast immobilization and patients undergoing knee arthroscopy have an increased risk of venous thrombosis (VT). Guidelines are ambiguous about thromboprophylaxis use, and individual risk factors for developing VT are often ignored. To assist in VT risk stratification and guide thromboprophylaxis use, various prediction models have been developed. These models depend largely on clinical factors and provide reasonably good C‐statistics of around 70%. We explored using protein levels in blood plasma measured by multiplexed quantitative targeted proteomics to predict VT. Our aim was to assess whether a VT risk prediction model based on absolute plasma protein quantification is possible. Methods We used internal standards to quantify proteins in less than 10 μl plasma. We measured 270 proteins in samples from patients scheduled for knee arthroscopy or with lower‐leg cast immobilization. The two prospective POT‐(K)CAST trails allow complementary views of VT signature in blood, namely pre and post trauma, respectively. From approximately 3000 patients, 31 patients developed VT who were included and matched with double the number of controls. Results Top discriminating proteins between cases and controls included APOC3, APOC4, APOC2, ATRN, F13B, and F2 in knee arthroscopy patients and APOE, SERPINF2, B2M, F13B, AFM, and C1QC in patients with lower‐leg cast. A logistic regression model with cross‐validation resulted in C‐statistics of 88.1% (95% CI: 85.7–90.6%) and 79.6% (95% CI: 77.2–82.0%) for knee arthroscopy and cast immobilization groups respectively. Conclusions Promising C‐statistics merit further exploration of the value of proteomic tests for predicting VT risk upon additional validation.
ISSN:1538-7933
1538-7836
1538-7836
DOI:10.1111/jth.15623