A landscape‐scale framework to identify refugia from multiple stressors

From a conservation perspective, quantifying potential refugial capacity has been predominantly focused on climate refugia, which is critical for maintaining the persistence of species and ecosystems. However, protection from other stressors, such as human‐induced changes in fire and hydrology, that...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology 2022-02, Vol.36 (1), p.e13834-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Rojas, Isabel M., Jennings, Megan K., Conlisk, Erin, Syphard, Alexandra D., Mikesell, Jack, Kinoshita, Alicia M., West, Krista, Stow, Doug, Storey, Emanuel, De Guzman, Mark E., Foote, Diane, Warneke, Alexandria, Pairis, Amber, Ryan, Sherry, Flint, Lorraine E., Flint, Alan L., Lewison, Rebecca L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:From a conservation perspective, quantifying potential refugial capacity has been predominantly focused on climate refugia, which is critical for maintaining the persistence of species and ecosystems. However, protection from other stressors, such as human‐induced changes in fire and hydrology, that cause habitat loss, degradation, and fragmentation is also necessary to ensure that conservation efforts focused on climate are not undermined by other threats. Thus, conceptual and methodological advances for quantifying potential refugia from multiple anthropogenic stressors are important to support conservation efforts. We devised a new conceptual approach, the domains of refugia, for assessing refugial capacity that identifies areas where exposure to multiple stressors is low. In our framework, patterns of environmental variability (e.g., increased frequency of warm summers), thresholds of resilience, and extent and intensity of stressors are used to identify areas of potential refugia from a suite of ongoing anthropogenic stressors (e.g., changes in fire regime). To demonstrate its utility, we applied the framework to a Southern California landscape. Sites with high refugial capacity (super‐refugia sites) had on average 30% fewer extremely warm summers, 20% fewer fire events, 10% less exposure to altered river channels and riparian areas, and 50% fewer recreational trails than the surrounding landscape. Our results suggest that super‐refugia sites (∼8200 km2) for some natural communities are underrepresented in the existing protected area network, a finding that can inform efforts to expand protected areas. Our case study highlights how considering exposure to multiple stressors can inform planning and practice to conserve biodiversity in a changing world. Marco Conceptual a para Identificar Refugios de Múltiples Amenazas a Escala de Paisaje Resumen Desde la perspectiva de la conservación, la cuantificación de la capacidad potencial de refugio se ha enfocado principalmente en los refugios climáticos, los cuales son críticos para mantener la persistencia de las especies y los ecosistemas. Sin embargo, la protección ante otros factores estresantes, como los cambios inducidos por los humanos en los incendios y la hidrología, que causan la pérdida, degradación y fragmentación del hábitat, también son necesarios para asegurar que los esfuerzos de conservación enfocados en el clima no sean afectados por otras amenazas. Por lo tanto, los avances conceptuales y me
ISSN:0888-8892
1523-1739
DOI:10.1111/cobi.13834