Unraveling the MRI‐Based Microstructural Signatures Behind Primary Progressive and Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Phenotypes
Background The mechanisms driving primary progressive and relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (PPMS/RRMS) phenotypes are unknown. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies support the involvement of gray matter (GM) in the degeneration, highlighting its damage as an early feature of both phenotype...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2022-01, Vol.55 (1), p.154-163 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
The mechanisms driving primary progressive and relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (PPMS/RRMS) phenotypes are unknown. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies support the involvement of gray matter (GM) in the degeneration, highlighting its damage as an early feature of both phenotypes. However, the role of GM microstructure is unclear, calling for new methods for its decryption.
Purpose
To investigate the morphometric and microstructural GM differences between PPMS and RRMS to characterize GM tissue degeneration using MRI.
Study Type
Prospective cross‐sectional study.
Subjects
Forty‐five PPMS (26 females) and 45 RRMS (32 females) patients.
Field Strength/Sequence
3T scanner. Three‐dimensional (3D) fast field echo T1‐weighted (T1‐w), 3D turbo spin echo (TSE) T2‐w, 3D TSE fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery, and spin echo‐echo planar imaging diffusion MRI (dMRI).
Assessment
T1‐w and dMRI data were employed for providing information about morphometric and microstructural features, respectively. For dMRI, both diffusion tensor imaging and 3D simple harmonics oscillator based reconstruction and estimation models were used for feature extraction from a predefined set of regions. A support vector machine (SVM) was used to perform patients' classification relying on all these measures.
Statistical Tests
Differences between MS phenotypes were investigated using the analysis of covariance and statistical tests (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1053-1807 1522-2586 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jmri.27806 |