Initial experience of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided antegrade covered stent placement with long duodenal extension for malignant distal biliary obstruction (with video)
Background/Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‐guided antegrade covered stent placement with long duodenal extension (EASL) for malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) with duodenal obstruction (DO) or surgically altered anatomy (SAA) after failed...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences 2021-12, Vol.28 (12), p.1130-1137 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background/Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‐guided antegrade covered stent placement with long duodenal extension (EASL) for malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) with duodenal obstruction (DO) or surgically altered anatomy (SAA) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Methods
Outcomes were technical and clinical success, reintervention rate, adverse events, stent patency, and overall survival. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and competing‐risk analysis were performed to compare with conventional EUS‐BD.
Results
Twenty‐five patients (DO, n = 18; SAA, n = 7) were included. The technical and clinical success rates were 96% and 84%, respectively. Reintervention occurred in two patients (8.3%). Adverse events occurred in six patients (24%; two cholangitis, 16%; four mild postprocedural pancreatitis [24% (n = 4/17) in patients with non‐pancreatic cancers]). The median patency was 9.4 months, and the overall survival was 2.73 months. After IPTW adjustment, the median patency in the EASL (n = 25) and conventional EUS‐BD (n = 29) were 10.1 and 6.5 months, respectively (P = .018).
Conclusions
EASL has acceptable clinical outcomes with a low reintervention rate but higher rate of postprocedural pancreatitis in patients with non‐pancreatic cancers. Randomized trials comparing EASL and conventional EUS‐BD for MDBO with pancreatic cancers and DO/SAA after failed ERCP are needed to validate our findings.
Highlight
So and colleagues conducted a pilot study of EUS‐guided antegrade covered stent placement with long duodenal extension (EASL) for malignant distal biliary obstruction after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. EASL resulted in a low reintervention rate. Median patency in EASL and conventional EUS‐guided biliary drainage was 10.1 and 6.5 months, respectively. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1868-6974 1868-6982 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jhbp.1011 |