Efficacy and safety of topical resorcinol 15% versus topical clindamycin 1% in the management of mild‐to‐moderate hidradenitis suppurativa: A retrospective study
Topical and systemic antibiotic therapy remains the first‐line treatment for mild‐to‐moderate hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). However, literature data on antibiotic resistance in HS are growing. A total of 134 patients with mild‐to‐moderate HS were retrospectively evaluated. Seventy‐three patients (g...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Dermatologic therapy 2022-06, Vol.35 (6), p.e15439-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Topical and systemic antibiotic therapy remains the first‐line treatment for mild‐to‐moderate hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). However, literature data on antibiotic resistance in HS are growing. A total of 134 patients with mild‐to‐moderate HS were retrospectively evaluated. Seventy‐three patients (group A) received topical clindamycin 1% and 61 patients (group B) received topical resorcinol 15%. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of topical 15% resorcinol versus topical 1% clindamycin in mild‐to‐moderate HS, comparing the clinical response at 12 weeks of treatment. Patients treated with resorcinol 15% showed a significant improvement in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response, International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System, and Pain Visual Analogue Scale score from baseline compared to patients treated with clindamycin 1%. Topical resorcinol 15% could be a valid alternative to clindamycin in the management of acute and long‐standing HS, limiting antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1396-0296 1529-8019 |
DOI: | 10.1111/dth.15439 |