The Appropriate of Cone Depth in Loop Electrical Excision Procedure (LEEP) for Negative Pathological Margin from High Grade Precancerous Lesion of Cervix, Retrospective Study

To determine the appropriate cone depth for treating high grade precancerous lesions to achieve negative pathological margins of cones from LEEPs. Other factors associated with positive pathological margin were also investigated. A Retrospective study recruited 170 patients who received indications...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 2022-02, Vol.23 (2), p.659-664
Hauptverfasser: Srijarusith, Noppames, Rodpenpear, Nopporn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To determine the appropriate cone depth for treating high grade precancerous lesions to achieve negative pathological margins of cones from LEEPs. Other factors associated with positive pathological margin were also investigated. A Retrospective study recruited 170 patients who received indications for LEEP during January 2015 to July 2020 were enrolled. The participants were operated by a single cut of LEEP and not had previously conization before. All patient data were collected into two groups, including negative and positive cone margin groups. Then, we used the cone depth by calculating from cone tissue after formalin fixation to eliminate shrinkage effect. The appropriate cut-off points for cone depth were calculated by ROC and analyzed factors that influence positive cone margin. The depth of cone (mm ±SD) of negative margin group was 8.70 (±3.36) and 6.13 (±2.28) mm in positive margin group. The appropriate cut-off points for cone depth were calculated by ROC presented at resection depth of 7.21 mm, which displayed proper cone depth with a sensitivity of 63.53% and specificity of 71.76%. Elderly age (adjusted OR 1.061, 95%CI 1.008-1.117, p=0.002), number of quadrants of lesion involvement (adjusted OR 1.182, 95%CI 1.312-2.513, p=
ISSN:2476-762X
1513-7368
2476-762X
DOI:10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.2.659