Capitellum and trochlea fractures. A systematic review of the literature

To investigate the outcome of capitellum and trochlea fractures through a systematic review of the contemporary literature. The effect on the outcome, of the posterolateral column comminution and the surgical approach used for fixation, was also evaluated. PUBMED, SCOPUS and MENDELEY databases were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 2022-08, Vol.31, p.101922-101922, Article 101922
Hauptverfasser: Stavrakakis, Ioannis M., Sylignakis, Panagiotis, Magarakis, George E., Ntontis, Zisis, Chaniotakis, Constantinos, Alvanos, Adamantios
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To investigate the outcome of capitellum and trochlea fractures through a systematic review of the contemporary literature. The effect on the outcome, of the posterolateral column comminution and the surgical approach used for fixation, was also evaluated. PUBMED, SCOPUS and MENDELEY databases were searched for capitellum and trochlea fractures and a systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The minimum one year clinical outcome and the flexion extension arc of these fractures, as well as the risk of developing degenerative arthritis were evaluated. The studies included to the meta - analysis were assessed based on the Newcastle Ottawa score. A fixed effect model was performed to compare the outcome and range of motion among Dubberley type A and type B fractures as well as between the extended lateral approach and the posterior transolecranon approach which were performed for Dubberley type B fractures. Furthermore the relative risk of degenerative arthritis (DA) among type A and type B fractures was also estimated. Chi square test was used to test heterogenity among studies. Ten nonrandomized case series were eligible to our inclusion criteria, including 76 patients in total. The fixed overall Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and the Range of Motion (ROM) of the Dubberley type A fractures was 86 (95% C.I.: 85,1–86,9) and 124 0 (95% C.I.: 122 0–124 0) respectively. The fixed overall MEPS and ROM of the Dubberley type B fractures was 84 (95%C.I.: 79,9–88,1) and 122 0 (95% C.I.: 120 0–123 0) respectively. Significant heterogenity was found though between studies regarding MEPS of type B fractures. The fixed overall MEPS and ROM for fractures treated with an extended lateral approach was 89,4 (95% C.I.: 85,36–93,44) and 123 0 (120 0–126 0) respectively. The fixed overall MEPS and ROM for fractures treated with a posterior transolecranon approach was 68,75 (95% C.I.: 67,89–69,6) and 122 0 (114 0–130 0) respectively. The degenerative arthritis relative risk (RR) of type B compared to type A fractures was 3,91 (95% C.I.: 0,84–18,13). There is no statistically significant difference among type A and type B fractures, in terms of outcome and ROM. The posterior transolecranon approach leads to a lower MEPS as opposed to the extended lateral approach. High quality studies comparing directly the outcome of type A and type B fractures are required, in order for safe conclusions to be extracted.
ISSN:0976-5662
2213-3445
DOI:10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101922