Role of renin–angiotensin system antagonists on long-term mortality post-percutaneous coronary intervention in reduced and preserved ejection fraction

Aims The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin II-receptor blockers (ARBs) post-myocardial infarction (MI) is supported by evidence based on trials performed in the thrombolysis era. This was prior to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) being routine prac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical research in cardiology 2022-07, Vol.111 (7), p.776-786
Hauptverfasser: Prosser, Hamish C., Peck, Kah Yong, Dinh, Diem, Roberts, Louise, Chandrasekhar, Jaya, Brennan, Angela, Duffy, Stephen J., Clark, David, Ajani, Andrew E., Oqueli, Ernesto, Sebastian, Martin, Reid, Christopher M., Freeman, Melanie, Sajeev, Jithin K., Teh, Andrew W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin II-receptor blockers (ARBs) post-myocardial infarction (MI) is supported by evidence based on trials performed in the thrombolysis era. This was prior to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) being routine practice, and with little direct evidence for the use of these medications in patients with preserved left ventricular (LV) function. This study sought to determine whether there is an association between ACEi/ARB use after PCI for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and long-term all-cause mortality, with a particular focus on patients with preserved LV function. Methods This multicentre, observational study evaluated prospectively collected data of 21,388 patients (> 18 years old) that underwent PCI for NSTEMI and STEMI between 2005 and 2018, and were alive at 30 day follow-up. Results In total, 83.8% of patients were using ACEi/ARBs. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated ACEi/ARB use was associated with a significantly lower mortality in the entire cohort (15.0 vs. 22.7%; p  
ISSN:1861-0684
1861-0692
DOI:10.1007/s00392-021-01985-x