Clinical, pathologic, and molecular analyses of superficial low‐grade fibromyxoid sarcoma in two young patients: A rare and deceptive mimic of benignancy

Low‐grade fibromyxoid sarcoma (LGFMS) is a histopathologically deceptive soft tissue neoplasm with bland cytology, which is typically encountered in deep soft tissue of adults. We report two cases of superficial LGFMS in young patients (16 and 21 years old, respectively), which were difficult to dia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cutaneous pathology 2022-07, Vol.49 (7), p.638-644
Hauptverfasser: Modi, Mitul B., Pei, Susan, Hedberg, Matthew L., Fischer, Andrew S., Guerrero, Jessenia, Carreon, Chrystalle Katte, Cooper, Kumarasen, Seykora, John T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Low‐grade fibromyxoid sarcoma (LGFMS) is a histopathologically deceptive soft tissue neoplasm with bland cytology, which is typically encountered in deep soft tissue of adults. We report two cases of superficial LGFMS in young patients (16 and 21 years old, respectively), which were difficult to diagnose on histopathologic and clinical findings alone. LGFMS commonly mimics benign neoplasms such as cellular neurothekeoma, fibromatosis, neurofibroma, and perineurioma. Malignancies included in the differential diagnosis are soft tissue neoplasms such as dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and myxofibrosarcoma. A high degree of reported variation in pattern and cellularity among LGFMS further complicates the diagnosis. Careful examination and appropriate immunohistochemistry panels including MUC4 are essential for narrowing the differential diagnosis. Molecular studies for possible FUS translocation can confirm the diagnosis of LGFMS. Sufficient sampling and workup of these lesions are critical, especially in younger patients. Young age and superficial presentation can easily sway dermatopathologists/dermatologists toward an incorrect diagnosis of benignancy.
ISSN:0303-6987
1600-0560
DOI:10.1111/cup.14215