Meta-Analysis of Dynamic Electrocardiography in the Diagnosis of Myocardial Ischemic Attack of Coronary Heart Disease

Background and Aims. Patients with coronary artery disease (CHD) are prone to early myocardial ischemia; early diagnosis of myocardial ischemia is of great significance in judging disease progression and guiding clinical intervention. However, reports on the accuracy of dynamic electrocardiogram (EC...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computational and mathematical methods in medicine 2022-06, Vol.2022, p.3472413-11
1. Verfasser: Ruan, Wenting
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Aims. Patients with coronary artery disease (CHD) are prone to early myocardial ischemia; early diagnosis of myocardial ischemia is of great significance in judging disease progression and guiding clinical intervention. However, reports on the accuracy of dynamic electrocardiogram (ECG) in the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia in patients with CHD are inconsistent. The purpose of the current meta-analysis was to analyze the efficacy of ECG in the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia attack in CHD. Methods. Chinese database (Wanfang, VIP, and CNKI) and English database (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, SinoMed, and Cochrane Library) were searched. A study on the collection of dynamic ECG in the diagnosis of myocardial ischemic attack of coronary heart disease to extract data and calculate sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), positive likelihood ratio (+LR), negative likelihood ratio (- LR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Draw summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC), and calculate area under curve (AUC). Stata 15 software was used for meta-analysis. Results. Twenty-seven literatures were included in this study. Meta-analysis results showed that Sen=0.78 (95% CI: 0.73~0.82), Spe=0.76 (95% CI: 0.68~0.82), +LR=2.79 (95% CI: 2.17~3.59), −LR=0.33 (95% CI: 0.27~0.40), AUC=0.84 (95% CI: 0.80~0.87), and DOR=9.66 (95% CI: 6.13~15.21). Subgroup analysis showed that the sensitivity of 12-lead ECG was higher than that of 3-lead ECG. The sensitivity and specificity of ST segment and QTc interphase changes were higher than those of ST segment changes alone (P
ISSN:1748-670X
1748-6718
DOI:10.1155/2022/3472413