Analysis of the prognostic role and biological characteristics of circulating tumor cell-associated white blood cell clusters in non-small cell lung cancer
Recently, circulating tumor-cell-associated white blood cell (CTC-WBC) clusters have been reported to have prognostic value in some cancers. The prognostic role of CTC-WBC clusters in lung cancer has not yet been elucidated. Very little information is available about the biological characteristics o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of thoracic disease 2022-05, Vol.14 (5), p.1544-1555 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Recently, circulating tumor-cell-associated white blood cell (CTC-WBC) clusters have been reported to have prognostic value in some cancers. The prognostic role of CTC-WBC clusters in lung cancer has not yet been elucidated. Very little information is available about the biological characteristics of CTC-WBC clusters.
A total of 82 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were included in this study, and 61 patients with advanced-stage disease were closely followed-up. All patients had blood drawn prior to treatment. Subtraction enrichment and immunostaining-fluorescence
hybridization (SE-iFISH) platform was used to isolate and identify CTCs and CTC-WBC clusters. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression analysis were applied to assess patient progression-free survival (PFS). Further, qualitative and quantitative analyses the size and ploidy characteristics of CTC-WBC clusters.
Firstly, CTC-WBC clusters appeared more in the advanced (stage III and IV) stage (P=0.043) than in the early stage. Furthermore, the multivariable analysis (Cox proportional hazards model) revealed that the high-CTC (≥7/6 mL) group and CTC-WBC clusters (≥1/6 mL) positive group both had significantly worse PFS, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.89 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.36-6.17, P=0.006] and 2.18 (95% CI: 1.07-4.43, P=0.031), respectively. In the conjoint analysis, compared to patients with |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2072-1439 2077-6624 |
DOI: | 10.21037/jtd-22-423 |