Comparative effectiveness of gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy on predicted 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease 5 years after surgery

Comparative evidence is needed when deciding which bariatric operation to undergo for long-term cardiovascular risk reduction. The Effectiveness of Gastric Bypass vs. Gastric Sleeve for Cardiovascular Disease (ENGAGE CVD) study compared the effectiveness of vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) and Roux...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgery for obesity and related diseases 2022-06, Vol.18 (6), p.716-726
Hauptverfasser: Basu, Anirban, Barton, Lee J., Fischer, Heidi, Reynolds, Kristi, Arterburn, David E., Barthold, Douglas, Courcoulas, Anita, Crawford, Cecelia L., Fedorka, Peter N., Kim, Benjamin B., Mun, Edward C., Murali, Sameer B., Zane, Robert E., Coleman, Karen J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Comparative evidence is needed when deciding which bariatric operation to undergo for long-term cardiovascular risk reduction. The Effectiveness of Gastric Bypass vs. Gastric Sleeve for Cardiovascular Disease (ENGAGE CVD) study compared the effectiveness of vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) operations for reduction of the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association–predicted 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk 5 years after surgery. Data for this study came from a large integrated healthcare system in the Southern California region of the United States. This is one of the most ethnically diverse (64% non-White) bariatric populations in the literature. The ENGAGE CVD cohort consisted of 22,095 patients who underwent VSG or RYGB from 2009–2016. The VSG and RYGB were compared using a local instrumental variable approach to address observed and unobserved confounding, as well as to conduct heterogeneity of treatment effects for patients of different age groups, baseline-predicted 10-year CVD risk using the ASCVD risk score, and those who had type 2 diabetes (T2D) at the time of surgery. Patients (2771 RYGB and 6256 VVSG) were primarily women (80.6%), Hispanic or non-Hispanic Black (63.7%), and 46 ± 10 years of age, with a body mass index of 43.40 ± 6.5 kg/m2. The predicted 10-year ASCVD risk at surgery was 4.1% for VSG and 5.1% for RYGB, decreasing to 2.6% for VSG and 2.8% for RYGB 1 year postoperatively. By 5 years after surgery, patients remained with relatively low risk levels (3.0% for VSG and 3.3% for RYGB) and there were no significant differences in predicted 10-year ASCVD risk between VSG and RYGB at any time. Predicted 10-year ASCVD risk was low in this population and remained low up to 5 years for those with diabetes, Black and Hispanic patients, and older adults. Literature reporting significant differences between VSG and RYGB in 10-year ASCVD risk may be a result of residual confounding. •The Effectiveness of Gastric Bypass vs. Gastric Sleeve for Cardiovascular Disease (ENGAGE CVD) study compared the effectiveness of vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) operations for reduction of the American College of Cardiology (ACA) and the American Heart Association (AHA) predicted 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk 5 years after surgery.•Patients (2,771 RYGB and 6,256 VSG) were primarily women (80.6%), Hispanic or non-H
ISSN:1550-7289
1878-7533
DOI:10.1016/j.soard.2022.02.021