Occurrence revisited: Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare in potable water in the USA
Nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTM) infections are increasing in the USA and have a high cost burden associated with treatment. Thus, it is necessary to understand what changes could be contributing to this increase in NTM disease rate. Water samples from 40 sites were collected from around the USA....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied microbiology and biotechnology 2022-04, Vol.106 (7), p.2715-2727 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTM) infections are increasing in the USA and have a high cost burden associated with treatment. Thus, it is necessary to understand what changes could be contributing to this increase in NTM disease rate. Water samples from 40 sites were collected from around the USA. They represented three water types: groundwater disinfected with chlorine and surface water disinfected with chlorine or monochloramine. Two methods, culture and qPCR, were used to measure
M. avium
and
M. intracellulare
. Heterotrophic bacteria and NTM counts were also measured.
M. avium
and
M. intracellulare
were molecularly detected in 25% (73/292) and 35% (102/292) of samples. The mean concentrations of
M. avium
and
M. intracellulare
were 2.8 × 10
3
and 4.0 × 10
3
genomic units (GU) L
−1
. The Northeast sites had the highest sample positively rate for both
M. avium
and
M. intracellulare
. The highest NTM counts and
M. avium
concentrations were observed in the surface water treated with chloramine. Geographic location and source water/disinfectant type were observed to significantly influence
M. avium
and
M. intracellulare
occurrence rates. These studies can help improve public health risk management by balancing disinfectant treatments and diverse microbial loads in drinking water.
Key points
• M. avium (MA) culture rate increased significantly: 1% (1999) to 13%.
• Culture versus qPCR method: 13% vs 31% for MA and 6% vs 35% for MI.
• The results of each method type tell two different stories of MA and MI occurrence.
Graphical abstract |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0175-7598 1432-0614 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00253-022-11849-7 |