Mental Health and Wellbeing of Retired Elite and Amateur Rugby Players and Non-contact Athletes and Associations with Sports-Related Concussion: The UK Rugby Health Project

Background Concerns have intensified over the health and wellbeing of rugby union and league players, and, in particular, about the longer-term effects of concussion. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there were differences in mental health, sleep and alcohol use between retired e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sports medicine (Auckland) 2022-06, Vol.52 (6), p.1419-1431
Hauptverfasser: Hind, Karen, Konerth, Natalie, Entwistle, Ian, Hume, Patria, Theadom, Alice, Lewis, Gwyn, King, Doug, Goodbourn, Thomas, Bottiglieri, Marianna, Ferraces-Riegas, Paula, Ellison, Amanda, Chazot, Paul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Concerns have intensified over the health and wellbeing of rugby union and league players, and, in particular, about the longer-term effects of concussion. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there were differences in mental health, sleep and alcohol use between retired elite and amateur rugby code players and non-contact athletes, and to explore associations with sports-related concussion. Methods 189 retired elite (ER, n  = 83) and amateur (AR, n  = 106) rugby code players (rugby union n  = 145; rugby league n  = 44) and 65 former non-contact athletes (NC) were recruited to the UK Rugby Health Project between 2016 and 2018. Details on sports participation and concussion history were obtained by questionnaire, which also included questions on mental health, anger, sleep, mood, alcohol use, social connections and retirement from injury. Data were compared between sports groups (ER, AR and NC), between exposure of three or more or five or more concussions and for years in sport. Results ER reported more concussions than AR (5.9 ± 6.3 vs. 3.7 ± 6.3, p  = 0.022) and NC (0.4 ± 1.0, p  
ISSN:0112-1642
1179-2035
DOI:10.1007/s40279-021-01594-8