Can surgical skills be taught using technological advances online? A comparative study of online and face-to-face surgical skills training

Introduction Online teaching has rapidly emerged as a viable alternative to traditional face-to-face education. How to teach surgical skills in the online environment, however, has not yet been fully established nor evaluated. Methods An international 1-day online surgical skills course consisting o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2022-06, Vol.36 (6), p.4631-4637
Hauptverfasser: Fehervari, Matyas, Das, Bibek, Soleimani-Nouri, Payam, Ahmad, Manal, Fadel, Michael G., Deputy, Mohammed, Morgan, Catrin, Burke, Joshua R., Mason, John D., Nott, David, Spalding, Duncan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Online teaching has rapidly emerged as a viable alternative to traditional face-to-face education. How to teach surgical skills in the online environment, however, has not yet been fully established nor evaluated. Methods An international 1-day online surgical skills course consisting of lectures, pre-recorded virtual workshops, live demonstrations and along with surgical skills teaching in breakout rooms was organised. Based on existing learning theories, new methods were developed to deliver skills teaching online. Simultaneously, traditional in-person surgical skills teaching was also conducted and used as a benchmark. Skills development was assessed by trained demonstrators and self-reported competency scores were compared between the online and face-to-face event. Results 553 delegates from 20 different countries attended the online course. Of these, 64 were trained in breakout rooms with a 1:5 demonstrator-to-delegate ratio whilst the remaining 489 delegates participated in didactic skills development sessions. In a separate face-to-face course, 20 delegates were trained with traditional methods. Demonstrators rated the competency of delegates for suturing, tendon repair and vascular anastomosis. There was no significant difference in the competency ratings of delegates receiving online teaching or face-to-face teaching ( p  = 0.253, p  = 0.084, p  = 1.00, respectively). The development of the same skills to “articulation” were not different between formats ( p  = 0.841, p  = 0.792, p  = 1.00, respectively). Post course self-rated competency scores improved for all technical skills ( p  
ISSN:0930-2794
1432-2218
DOI:10.1007/s00464-022-09170-5