Clinical course and outcome of an outpatient clinic population with myasthenia gravis and COVID‐19
Introduction/Aims Coronavirus disease‐2019 (COVID‐19) may have a more severe course in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). We aimed to assess severity of the infection and factors contributing to its severity in a group of MG patients, most of whom were not hospitalized. Methods One hundred forty...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Muscle & nerve 2022-04, Vol.65 (4), p.447-452 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction/Aims
Coronavirus disease‐2019 (COVID‐19) may have a more severe course in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). We aimed to assess severity of the infection and factors contributing to its severity in a group of MG patients, most of whom were not hospitalized.
Methods
One hundred forty outpatients with MG followed between March 2020 and April 2021 were included in our study. Patients were asked to respond to a brief questionnaire in person, by telemedicine, or through electronic messages.
Results
Nineteen patients tested positive for COVID‐19 by polymerase chain reaction. Two were asymptomatic. Of the 17 symptomatic patients, 11 had mild symptoms. They either had no treatment or received antivirals, antibiotics, and anticoagulants. Their myasthenia was well‐controlled before infection and was unaffected by COVID‐19. Three patients with moderate COVID‐19 required hospitalization, but not intensive care, and had full recovery. Three other patients, the oldest in the cohort, had severe disease: One patient with a postsurgery myasthenic exacerbation before the infection needed intensive care without intubation, but recovered completely; two morbidly obese patients with comorbidities required intubation and died. Corticosteroids were increased in four of the six moderate/severely affected patients. Immunosuppressive (IS) agents were generally continued. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for COVID‐19 was used in one patient.
Discussion
Most patients had mild COVID‐19 and all but two patients recovered. The design of the study made it possible to capture mild cases. Having well‐controlled MG before infection and absence of comorbidities likely affected the course of the infection favorably. IS did not influence the progression. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0148-639X 1097-4598 |
DOI: | 10.1002/mus.27497 |