Validation of a novel mobile phone application for type 2 diabetes screening following gestational diabetes mellitus

We sought to determine if using fasting blood glucose (FBG) through text-based care is an effective screening tool for type 2 diabetes in the postpartum period compared to in-person, 2-hour oral glucose tolerance testing (2hr OGTT). This was a single-center interventional study that included individ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:mHealth 2022-04, Vol.8, p.12-12
Hauptverfasser: Gomez Slagle, Helen B, Hoffman, Matthew K, Caplan, Richard, Shlossman, Philip, Sciscione, Anthony C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We sought to determine if using fasting blood glucose (FBG) through text-based care is an effective screening tool for type 2 diabetes in the postpartum period compared to in-person, 2-hour oral glucose tolerance testing (2hr OGTT). This was a single-center interventional study that included individuals diagnosed with gestational diabetes. Patients were enrolled in standard, office-based 2hr OGTT in combination with text-based remote diabetes screening. Study participants were instructed to record FBG for 3 consecutive days using a mobile application. We assessed agreement with 2hr OGTT using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value with exact binomial 95% confidence intervals. A total of 446 individuals diagnosed with gestational diabetes met inclusion criteria, 239 of which were enrolled in standard office-based screening and 207 were enrolled in dual screening using standard 2hr OGTT testing combined with text-based remote FBG screening. A FBG value less than 100 mg/dL had 100% sensitivity (86-100%), 86% specificity (77-93%) with a 100% (94-100%) negative predictive value and 71% (54-85%) positive predictive value. Follow-up was significantly higher among individuals enrolled in remote text-based screening compared to standard in-office screening (48% 25%, respectively; P
ISSN:2306-9740
2306-9740
DOI:10.21037/mhealth-21-36