Effectiveness and safety of Ivermectin in COVID‐19 patients: A prospective study at a safety‐net hospital

Ivermectin has been found to inhibit severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) replication in vitro. It is unknown whether this inhibition of SARS‐CoV‐2 replication correlates with improved clinical outcomes. To assess the effectiveness and safety of ivermectin in hospitalized pat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of medical virology 2022-04, Vol.94 (4), p.1473-1480
Hauptverfasser: Ozer, Muhammet, Goksu, Suleyman Yasin, Conception, Reena, Ulker, Esad, Balderas, Rodolfo Magallanes, Mahdi, Mohammed, Manning, Zulfiya, To, Kim, Effendi, Muhammad, Anandakrishnan, Rajashree, Whitman, Marc, Gugnani, Manish
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Ivermectin has been found to inhibit severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) replication in vitro. It is unknown whether this inhibition of SARS‐CoV‐2 replication correlates with improved clinical outcomes. To assess the effectiveness and safety of ivermectin in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19. A total of 286 patients with COVID‐19 were included in the study. Univariate analysis of the primary mortality outcome and comparisons between treatment groups were determined. Logistic regression and propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for confounders. Patients in the ivermectin group received 2 doses of Ivermectin at 200 μg/kg in addition to usual clinical care on hospital Days 1 and 3. The ivermectin group had a significantly higher length of hospital stay than the control group; however, this significance did not maintain on multivariable logistic regression analysis. The length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and duration of mechanical ventilation were longer in the control group. However, a mortality benefit was not seen with ivermectin treatment before and after PSM (p values = 0.07 and 0.11, respectively). ICU admission, and intubation rate were not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.49, and p = 1.0, respectively). No differences were found between groups regarding the length of hospital stay, ICU admission, intubation rate, and in‐hospital mortality.
ISSN:0146-6615
1096-9071
DOI:10.1002/jmv.27469